Letter to Council on Foreign Relations

Letter Sent to Massachusetts Congressmen:

Hello friend! Below please find assorted information about the energy plan that I have preliminarily assessed and potentials and risks about the transition to this new technology that we will need to guide.

http://tacticaledge.blogspot.com/2008/02/view-mailbox-compose-address-book.html

Letter to Council on Foreign Relations about the Infinite Energy Machine:

Council on Foreign Relations

Respected Ladies and Gentlemen,

Thank you for your consideration of my recent email. Thane Heins is added to the list of infinite energy pioneers. He has produced this device with less than $1000 of materials. Affixed to a car or an in-home generator or heating system, or released into the media or ever sold, this could have sweeping economic implications. As scientific data and communications abilities increase this kind of invention will become still more common.

Please consider this article and my publications and the potential consequences and benefits that infinite energy can bring to humanity. A civilization full of enlightened and well studied individuals and communities is precious and worth cultivating and investing in.

I recognize the desire of some secret societies to produce a '500 million person' utopia, in tune with nature. But with this machine that could be done adequately with 50 billion humans and all terrains could be made ecologically friendly and spaciously organized without the clear consequences and instability of producing a 500 million person population. Well known within the scientific community is that on this century's horizon are many advances that could freely and voluntarily make every human a superhuman.

The article:
http://www.thestar.com/Article/300041

Tyler Hamilton
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/columnists/94629

[article excluded from email]

Letter 2:
Western Revelation of High Energy Technology

The greatest incentive to produce this technology is the outstanding increase in economic and organizational capacity that it would bring to mankind. Voluntary organizational systems such as the CFR are more effective than mandated systems or those of pure necessity or coincidence. A world with clean energy without pollution and entirely comprised of these voluntarily associative systems would be well improved above this one.

What are the greatest risks of the proliferation of a free energy machine, presuming as is probable from reference and theory that they do exist behind closed doors at corporations such as ExxonMobil, General Motors, or General Electric, or in the hands of the United States, British, French, or German governments or militaries, or the CIA or another agency?

The greatest apparent risk is the weaponization of this technology. A free energy device could produce wave-bearing electrical weapons of unlimited amperage, the kind which the United States is developing today to use in Iraq. One such device is a high frequency microwave device that can cause a car to explode in a fraction of a second at full power from hundreds of yards away. If any capably minded government or rogue group got access to this device they could quietly prepare for and quickly launch major assaults causing massive and serious damage before adequate responses could be made.

William Reich invented a 'death ray' in the 1920's which Imperial Japan offered to purchase from him in 1938. He politely refused, which may have changed the war. His laboratory was ransacked in 1946 by Soviet spies and he was shot, wounding him. The technology was likely acquired by the US Government and concealed.

These feats have been reproduced in our commercial and military laboratories. Today as atomics, chemistry and string theory are becoming better understood the arrival of more new energy technologies is becoming an increasing probability. The Large Hadron Collider will be online soon and should theoretically be able to produce miniscale black holes, which may be very useful for generation of energy or weapons. The process of wave alchemy popularized with the microwave and custom made in laboratories in 2006-2008 could be converted to easily and cheaply refine weapons grade nuclear material. It may be wiser to begin revealing this technology actively than wait and be surprised by a rogue inventor or faction's disruption, as we have traditionally waited to be attacked or attacked ourselves in American military history. We could just start talking about it.

The economy provides two services: materials/services, and control of these factions and even world governments. Participation and taxation in the industrial/commercial system allows the state and corporations to exercise a level of control over society in a manner similar to good neighborhoods reducing crime rates. Given an abundant supply of free energy, many citizens may reduce their participation in society's labor systems and could no longer require heating oil or fuel, grid electricity, reduce their consumption and raise their productivity in competition with the control economy. Without the fiscal requirement of great cooperation for survival or success, without needing to work so hard to purchase goods and services, many individuals would retire or reduce their workload considerably, or feel able to purchase many goods of various sorts, or to leave society for extended periods or altogether.

"nah whats the point when I can just do something I know im good at and have fun doing it!"
-webizen

The need to use the system to achieve goals could dramatically reduce. Without this traditional cooperation critical shortages in mandatory social functions such as dirty menial and cordial tasks such as cashiering, garbage collection and taxi services, hospital staffing, factory and technician production, mining and agriculture, and others may dry up.

Individuals would be far freer to strike out on their own as business entities and abandon the fields they disliked. The free market might no longer be able to pull society together to provide services in the way it does without the same impetus for money. The severity of these shortages may cripple society.

This process may have already begun with construction of massive FEMA camps in America, unConstitutional private intelligence gathering, military funding, research, engagement, invasion and mobilization to oil and strategic resource areas in the Middle East and testing of public willingness to react to
emergency and other Constitutional studies.

It has been estimated that this switchover revolution will take 18 months. This switchover will be a massive undertaking, a bigger program globally than any in human history, rivaling WW2 in scale.


Scenarios for Transition:

In the best scenario, the state would secretly build up a large supply of these machines and warehouse them alongside emergency goods across the country. They would be guarded and distributed to public businesses as the plans to build them are released through the media and the goods required to build them subsidized, sold, and given by grant through application to any citizen.

Economic conditions would become rosy as people's needs were fulfilled more easily. Technician work would triple immediately and could be met by private and public sectors working alongside to serve the needs of a new publicly driven economy. New pathways would be drawn up and libertarian principles and freedom of intelligence would be adopted as economic conditions spread.

After about 18-36 months this trend would restabilize as a perfusion of the technology throughout society. The new economy would rebuild through every previous institution. Electric and water powered engines would replace ~all gasoline engines and all power plants would be replaced by water or new technology municipal power sources. Central banks would have far less leverage ability, if any, and Federal government participation would become far less crucial while localized economies working together would prosper and have the backing to function independently from the whole. This pattern would cascade down through every world government and institution to the family level, and up from the bottom as well.

This scenario is a rough outline of one of the best possibilities of this revolutionary change. Several risks present themselves, which need to be addressed or rejected.

1. Civilian separatist groups
2. Controlling financial interests
3. Public economic shortage
4. Controlling government interests

These can be compared to the 4 Horsemen

1. Civilian Separatist Groups

Civilian separatist groups may need to be pacified or educated, as releasing this technology to the public will also be giving it to every KKK chapter and every gangland organization.

Legalizing drugs alongside this move would be almost defacto, and preparing our civilization for it today rather than 2 months afterwards may be wiser. Legalizing drugs will quickly drain money from street and jungle gangsters, who are major threats to civilian life and social stability in this environment. Sadly, the techniques of technology repression we've been performing for decades have been weakening our positions in relation to this revelation for over 20 years, from our public education base to our industrial preparedness.

Legalizing drugs may detract from social organization during this period, but we trade that for better armed gangsters on the day of media revelation, when there is a middle ground.

The state, major corporations, the military, and other organizations would face substantial disruption and opposition from the exposure of their guilt in concealing this information and technology for a number of decades if the truth is told immediately. Opposition would likely be quite motivated and further facilitated by the technology itself.

The recognition of this technology's presence will demotivate and devalue the public from using gasoline and other supply chain and chain of command pathways, disrupting our economy which supports the public. Avoiding major crises at the onset +2-3 weeks and +2-3 months will be important.

Members of the public will probably build hundreds of thousands of these devices themselves for private use in the days and weeks following major media publication, alongside legal suits likely filed through FOIA. Many could abort society if given this technology. While their cooperation is not necessary, their additional possible disruption and the local lack of authority they may produce could become important risks. Once this technology is released publicly it will be difficult to measure our public level of risk and unforeseen consequences of discontinuity of supply will be far enhanced. This is likely what George Bush's FEMA camps and semi-suspended Constitution are for, and his enormous ranch in Paraguay.

Months 3-9 would bring this industrial material mass produced to the public and private sectors themselves, likely first to industries and engineering firms seeded and challenged with the information and new grants or loans to produce the machinery itself and devices better using it. The start of this period could face public rioting and other serious trouble as informed people gain proof and access to this technology.

You may also want to examine urban violent crime reduction by meditation as a treatment technique for urban risks. This has been scientifically proven to reduce violent crime by ~1/4.


2. Controlling Financial Interests

Note a letter from Carlyle Group from Fall 2006 that says we will have 'zero liquidity' starting within a 12-24 month window from the release. This window began Fall 2007 and ends Fall 2008. This is likely predicting this kind of a release date, or an economic condition preparing for its release.

Major financial and government players who own this technology already and have worked to suppress it may be planning to release it or prepare the environment for releasing it, as we in the public through scientific and university branches will be discovering it or newer and cheaper ways similar to it 'any day now'. Progressive scientists have made simpler and simpler machines for this, from Nikola Tesla in the 1890's, Dr Moray in the 1920's, Dr Reich in the 1930's, the atomic bomb and other pursuits which dominated the 1940's, UFO elements relative to the Battle of Los Angeles, Roswell, Truman and Eisenhower from the 1950's, an Indonesian scientist's water car and the space program in the 1950's and 1960's, various concealed automobile engine advancements from the 1970's alongside the oil embargo, Stanley Meyer's dune buggy and the 'water ram' from the 1980's and 1990's, and John Kanzius and Thane Heins' special inventions from 2007 and 2008. These inventions have become progressively easier to master, and their intersection with the general public is due for 2008 or 2009, with a real transition period likely taking place from onset until 2012 and beyond.

These giant corporations and world governments are holding onto power by keeping this technology private, to the detriment of our world through war and shortage without it. This technology likely should have been released around 1956-1964 to defend our government organized methodology infrastructure. Our advanced scientists of the day could have helped develop this technology and introduced more safely to humanity at the time. Since we are about 40 years late in introducing this technology, we will be cutting through 40 years of redundant government and social orchestration.

The intentions of these major corporations and the Federal agencies that have delayed introduction for their own reasons is unknown. This is a risk we will be facing as we work to introduce this technology ourselves as liberty and the Constitution and natural law dictates we should, and should have then. Ideally they will work with us towards these goals across all mankind, or not keep us from them.

3 Public Economic Shortage

Public economic shortage is a risk during this transition. If the original best case scenario plan is interrupted by one or more of these 4 problems it is probable that the public sector will experience a serious economic shortage and lack in this transition, which would snowball upon itself unless these machines can be used to produce infrastructure quickly. The most pressing problem will be starvation. Even with plenty of electricity and water, [note Dean Kamen's water purification machine] food still takes a long time to grow.

We will be performing this switchover during a major depression, especially if the switchover continues to be delayed and economic indications are not picked up by excitement about this technology and the new industrial effects it will produce. This will produce the greatest humanitarian aid crisis we will see in our lifetimes.

4 Controlling Government Interest

This is an excellent season for a coup d'etat. Even though this fantastic technology will be available to us and will change the way we build products and move money and organize forever, unknown sinister groups in government may seek to gain advantages at this switchover.

FEMA camps may be used for good or evil. In 1933 world companies attempted to overthrow FDR and install a fascist government in America. A fascist coup using these FEMA camps and our own or Canadian and British military forces could be organized through our existing White House using martial law 'continuity of government' and media control with illegitimate motives. A martial law during this time may actually be a coup. Existing millionaire's clubs have goals of population reduction to 500 million and racist and unequal seniority structures imposed upon mankind that they may devote resources to maintain. This machine is an ultimate field leveling apparatus, and could be seen by some as massively rewarding or empowering those who do not deserve such an honor. Many of those people are anti-humanitarians and prejudiced.

Corporate involvement with governments may become corrupted or motivated by an interest to keep this machine away from populations to maintain monopolies. This is not the duty of the state, and a state that does this is subverted and not working in the interest of We the People. This may be difficult to gauge officially because of the control states have over their own processes of judicial review and their abridging of guaranteed rights.

Effecting justice in these situations will also be challenging and the correct pathway for producing legitimate justice will be guided best by natural law and the Constitution as it stands and not by a forceful organization or suspension of rights.


Thank you for your interest in this topic and in public safety. If all goes well the prospects for 2015 are magnificent. We will see what infinite possibility brings. May it be wonderful.

<>< William






:::Original Version of Email Follows:::








Date Thu, 7 Feb 2008 4:46 AM ( 1 week ago ) Text view

From xxxx@x.xx

To grose@cfr.org, wnash@cfr.org, ckupchan@cfr.org, jkendall@cfr.org, president@cfr.org, JZelmati@cfr.org, rferrell@cfr.org, icoleman@cfr.org, mboot@cfr.org, sbiddle@cfr.org, pbeinart@cfr.org, rtakeyh@cfr.org, ssimon@cfr.org,
vali.nasr@tufts.edu, matthew.j.slaughter@dartmouth.edu, cferguson@cfr.org, smallaby@cfr.org, David.Victor@stanford.edu, mbazzi@cfr.org, scook@cfr.org,
noah_feldman@harvard.edu, bgwertzman@cfr.org, jhelman@cfr.org, wmead@cfr.org, bsetser@cfr.org, asegal@cfr.org, jharley@cfr.org, eeconomy@cfr.org, jcohen@cfr.org, jhill@cfr.org
gsamore@cfr.org, "myself"

Subject:
Council on Foreign Relations and the Infinite Energy Machine


Council on Foreign Relations

Respected Ladies and Gentlemen,

Thank you for your consideration of my recent email. Thane Heins is added to the list of infinite energy pioneers. He has produced this device with less than $1000 of materials. Affixed to a car or an in-home generator of heating system, or released into the media or ever sold, this could be the kind of device I discussed in my previous proposal. As scientific data and communications abilities increase this will become still more common.

Please consider this article and my publications and the potential consequences and benefits that infinite energy can bring to humanity. A civilization full of enlightened and well studied individuals and communities is precious and worth cultivating and investing in.

I recognize the desire of some secret societies to produce a '500 million person' utopia, in tune with nature. But with this machine that could be done adequately with 50 billion humans and all terrains could be made ecologically friendly and spaciously organized without the clear
consequences and instability of producing a 500 million person population. Well known within the scientific community is that on this century's horizon are many advances that could freely and voluntarily make every human a superhuman.

The article:
http://www.thestar.com/Article/300041

Tyler Hamilton
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/columnists/94629

"Energy Reporter
It all began back in 1985, when Thane Heins, having studied electronics at Heritage College in Gatineau, Quebec, started thinking about how magnets could be used to improve power generators.

But it wasn't until after the 9/11 attacks that he started seriously experimenting in his basement, motivated by the desire to reduce our dependence on oil and the countries that back terrorism.

Heins tinkered away, making what seemed like good progress, until one day in early 2006 he stumbled on to something strange. As part of a test, he had connected the driveshaft of an electric motor to a steel rotor with small round magnets lining its outer edges. The idea was that
as the rotor spun, the magnets would pass by a wire coil placed just in front of them to generate electrical energy – in other words, it would operate like a simple generator.

The voltage was there, but to get current he had to attach an electrical load to the coil – like a light bulb – or simply overload it, which would cause it to slow down and eventually stop. Heins did the latter, but instead of stopping, the rotor started to rapidly accelerate.

"The magnets started flying off and hitting the wall, and I had to duck for cover," says Heins, surprised because he was using a weak motor. "It was like, holy crap, this is really scary."

By overloading the generator, the current should have caused the coil to build up a large electromagnetic field. This field typically creates an effect called "Back EMF," described as Lenz's law in physics, which would act to repel the approaching magnets on the rotor and slow down
the motor until it stopped. Some call it the law of diminishing returns, or a law of conservation.

"Lenz's law is essentially magnetic friction, which is a form of resistance not unlike the wind resistance your car experiences when driving down the highway," explains Heins. More friction means more power is necessary to maintain a constant speed.

Instead, the opposite happened. Somehow the magnetic friction had turned into a magnetic boost. Back to the car analogy, it's like the wind moving from the front to the back of the vehicle.

Days later, Heins realized what had happened: The steel rotor and driveshaft had conducted the magnetic resistance away from the coil and back into the heart of the electric motor. Since such motors work on the principle of converting electrical energy into motion by creating
rotating magnetic fields, he figured the Back EMF was boosting those fields, causing acceleration.

But how could this be? It would create a positive feedback loop. As the motor accelerated faster it would create a larger electromagnetic field on the generator coil, causing the motor to go faster, and so on and so on. Heins confirmed his theory by replacing part of the driveshaft with
plastic pipe that wouldn't conduct the magnetic field. There was no acceleration.

"What I can say with full confidence is that our system violates the law of conservation of energy," he says.

"Now, is that perpetual motion? Will it end up being that?""


Thank you, doctors and gentlemen.

William Bunker


Date Mon, 4 Feb 2008 7:11 AM ( 1 week 3 days ago )

From x@x.xx
To "myself", grose@cfr.org, wnash@cfr.org, ckupchan@cfr.org, jkendall@cfr.org, president@cfr.org, JZelmati@cfr.org, rferrell@cfr.org, icoleman@cfr.org, mboot@cfr.org, sbiddle@cfr.org, pbeinart@cfr.org, rtakeyh@cfr.org, ssimon@cfr.org, vali.nasr@tufts.edu, wmead@cfr.org, jhelman@cfr.org, bgwertzman@cfr.org, noah_feldman@harvard.edu, scook@cfr.org, mbazzi@cfr.org, David.Victor@stanford.edu, smallaby@cfr.org, cferguson@cfr.org, matthew.j.slaughter@dartmouth.edu, bsetser@cfr.org, asegal@cfr.org, jharley@cfr.org, eeconomy@cfr.org, jcohen@cfr.org, jhill@cfr.org, gsamore@cfr.org

Subject:
Western Revelation of High Energy Technology


The greatest incentive to produce this technology is the outstanding increase in economic and organizational capacity that it would bring to mankind. Voluntary organizational systems such as the CFR are more effective than mandated systems or those of pure necessity or coincidence. A world with clean energy without pollution and entirely comprised of these voluntarily associative systems would be well improved above this one.

On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:33:09 -0800, x@x.xx said:

Council on Foreign Relations


Respected Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am forwarding this conversation to you on advice from a friend to contact the Council on Foreign Relations. I have heard of this organization before in the context of Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, and Bill Richardson. I request your assistance in sponsorship to the think tank and include research material that could be interesting to you.

Below is the conversation, followed by an extended explanation and links to blogs on other topics. Please consider them and my request for association with the Council on Foreign Relations.

William Bunker


"xxx wrote:
For a man of such a young age, you have a lot of insight into the adversity of our government. You are also young enough to develop more of an impact. I recommend that you try to get sponsored into the CFR...you should know what I mean here. Also, read "Tragedy and Hope" by Carroll Quigley for a professional outlook on the historical development of our societies. The works of G. Edward Griffin are very professional as well. Please don't allow yourself to get caught up in the "conspiracy theorist" attitude like that of Alex Jones. His presentation is foolish and not of sufficient depth.

Here's a good question for you to let me know if you go deep enough:
Do you think WTC7 was a controlled demolition on 9-11?


Good Luck,
xxx


My response to xxx:

Thank you, xxx.

I would enjoy discussing many things with CFR members, but in some cases I find their actions reprehensible. How would a young man become sponsored into the CFR? I found their website and will forward some of my letters to them and link them to my published works and also some videos. I believe I would find being a fellow at the CFR quite enjoyable and similar to my current experiences.

Griffin's work with visible ballots is heartening. I am examining the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in escalating detail in the coming weeks.

WTC7. I have studied 9/11 in great detail. I believe as you say you are testing me for an opportunity. I will not defy the intelligence that I have received in truth without a major sustainable overbearing reason to remain quiet about it, let alone weaken my personal structure by
accepting or repeating known lies However, such reasons to withhold can exist. As I describe in the letter relating to free energy machines, around 18 months would pass from the public scientific release of the first such energy machines and the end of a wave of chaos and destruction that could substantially threaten mankind.

Before releasing this technology from its hiding places it will be necessary to equip mankind suitably to not crush or tear itself apart from having such great power. Keeping this technology away from the public sector until that can be established is important, and I would be willing to advise the CFR or other think tanks seeding world controllers on the best ways to accomplish this readiness and maintain it during the transition.

Irregardless of who has organized WTC7, and the events of 9/11, we can know several things from available evidence. This topic has been well groomed and the event's social and global importance warrant such investigation. The context of events occurring on that day relate in importance to WTC7.

The 47-story building had two fires in upper floors. At around 5pm, after burning for around 7 hours, the building collapsed. At first relative individuals said that it collapsed from the fire, or from gas explosions in the building. Later it came to light that it was ordered
to be demolished by the new owner as of only a few months before, Larry Silverstein, who collected substantial insurance on the property.

As far as forensic and engineering data, a building could not easily or safely be rigged with demolition explosives in only 7 hours. Nor while burning. Nor would it be probable to pull that much attention to the fires on two floors during a nation-wide emergency.

It is quite probable that the building had been rigged with demolition explosives before the plane impacts. Whether this was commercial, as some engineers do this to modern buildings today, such as casino owners, or whether it was in preparation for the day remains to be discovered.

You may know that the Israeli instant messaging service 'Odigo' produced a number of warnings to members 2 hours before the plane strikes that were accurate to the minute. This is direct proof of premeditation of the events and probably incidental to key agents taking places upon the
planes or past security at Logan Airport, and reporting in to their colleagues or being detected and allowed to pass by our intelligence.

We do have the capability to perform this kind of attack on ourselves, technologically and logistically. It is not outside the bounds of possibility that we attacked ourselves on 9/11 to propel ourselves into a social environment and a series of wars and political and economic
conditions aimed at preparing us for this energy technology release or another globe-level structural change event.

This is a very large topic to broach, and doing so in the context of a CFR meeting would be quite attractive to me.

This shift is a massive event, requiring extensive preparation. How would you prepare the world for such a shift?

<>< William"


After this conversation I began considering what steps will need to be taken for this conversion procedure, and what steps may have already been taken by world organizations from midstream.

What are the greatest risks of the proliferation of a free energy machine, presuming as is probable from reference and theory that they do exist behind closed doors at corporations such as ExxonMobil, General Motors, or General Electric, or in the hands of the United States,
British, French, or German governments or militaries, or the CIA or another agency?

The greatest apparent risk is the weaponization of this technology. A free energy device could produce wave-bearing electrical weapons of unlimited amperage, the kind which the United States is developing today to use against cars and other vehicles. One such device is a high frequency microwave device that can cause a car to explode in a fraction of a second at full power from hundreds of yards away. If any capably minded government, or rogue group, got access to this device they could quietly prepare for and quickly launch major assaults against major cities and military establishments from a plane or tower, causing massive and serious damage before adequate responses could be made.

Myths say that William Reich invented a 'death ray' in the 1920's, and that Imperial Japan offered to purchase it from him in 1938. In the context of the globe, he politely refused, although his laboratory was ransacked in 1946 by Soviet spies and he was shot, wounding him. The
technology was likely acquired by the US Government and concealed. In the late 1920's Dr Thomas Henry Moray created a similar machine that resonated with cosmic rays to produce electricity without visible input.

This and other inventions are in technological context to Nikola Tesla's and Albert Einstein's wave theory and atomic advances of the late 1800's and early 1900's, and would be a monument on the scale of the AC motor, radio, television, radar, nuclear fission, the Manhattan Project, and
the Navy's published Philadelphia Experiment, passing a ship 4 hours through time in 1943. These feats have been reproduced in commercial laboratories on smaller scales in the 1990's. [I regret that these works are momentarily uncited.]

As we are continually bathed in energy from the universe and its formation is becoming better understood in atomics, chemistry and string theory, this arrival is an increasing possibility. The Large Hadron Collider will be online soon and should theoretically be able to produce miniscale black holes, which may be very useful for generation of energy or weapons. The process of wave alchemy popularized with the microwave and made custom in laboratories in 2006/7 could be converted to easily and cheaply refine weapons grade nuclear fuels. It may be wiser for world organizational bodies to begin this revelation process actively and have initiative than wait and be surprised by a rogue inventor or faction.

The economic risks of a free energy machine are large. The economy provides two services: materials/services, and control. Participation and taxation in the industrial/commercial system allows the state and corporations to exercise a level of control over
society in a manner similar to good neighborhoods reducing crime rates. Given an abundant supply of free energy, many citizens may reduce their participation in society's labor systems and could very promptly no longer require heating oil or fuel, grid electricity, and could reduce their consumption and raise their productivity of other products. Without the fiscal requirement of great cooperation for survival or success, without needing to work so hard to purchase goods and services, many individuals would retire or reduce teir workload considerably, or feel able to purchase many goods of various sorts, or to leave society for extended periods or altogether, considering the approval rating of Congress and the President.

"nah whats the point when I can just do something I know im good at and have fun doing it!"
-webizen

The need to use the system to pursue and achieve goals could dramatically reduce. Without this traditional cooperation, complex and undesirable or previously disproportionately rewarding services may dry up, causing critical shortages in mandatory social functions such as dirty menial and cordial tasks such as cashiering, garbage collection and taxi services, hospital staffing, factory and technician production, mining and agriculture, and others.

Some of these shortages could be replaced by additional robotic production or additional interest in complex and skilled labor and services enabled by the energy devices, but many would be limited. Individuals would be far freer to strike out on their own as business entities and abandon the fields they disliked. The free market might no longer be able to pull society together to provide services in the way it does without the same impetus for plain money, and a greater demand for complex and interesting goods for and from a newly rich populace.

The severity of these shortages may cripple society and the rewards offered for these jobs may become unfulcrumable and irreplaceable. This would quickly lead to problem number one and become a feedback loop into itself.

The best reason for releasing or preparing for this release of technology now are avoiding being caught by a viral surprise, civil or military. The consequences occurring while prepared for this probability are great but lesser than those of a society and government caught largely unaware. The preparatory actions and resources necessary for such a controlled revelation depend on many possibilities.

Firstly again the invasion of foreign powers and factions. A sufficiently scaled national defense military and weapons useful to countering and preventing this kind of death ray will be necessary, as large scale weaponization could be quite deadly.

Enclaving of foreign powers such as Iran or Pakistan, others in Eastern Europe, China, Russia, North Korea, Indonesia, or elsewhere with this technology could become dangerous. Militaries with time to organize large masses of these pieces of equipment in opposition to one another or the production of satellites capable of producing focused beams on this level of destruction are past spy movie to horror movie level events that could wipe out large populations of mankind and major urban centers.

These and powers like them will need to be attacked or reconciled early upon the release of this technology or they could become the very well armed opposition, the goal result being a mankind united through this power system without energetic or nuclear conflict. Factional groups developing this technology could be eavesdropped upon using remaining telecommunication systems and our well equipped international intelligence agencies and reconciled through our paramilitary and police forces.

Again, this process may have already begun with construction of massive FEMA camps in America, unconstitutional private intelligence gathering, military funding, research, engagement, invasion and mobilization to oil and strategic resource areas, testing of public willingness to react to
emergency and other Constitutional studies, and other internationally coordinating and polarizing events such as over the war in Iraq and other examples of aggression.

Unfortunately this test has been slighted or complicated by the perception of our state leaders and institutional system as corrupt and threatening to democracy by large swaths of the population and numerous instances of failed secret keeping have contributed to a damaged reputation of our government and intelligence agency, which is presumed to be the positive attractor in this polarizing litmus test in preparation for intelligently revealing this technology.

I also invite you to examine my School of Esoteric Magnetic Phenomenon's
research proposal at SOEMP Research Proposal

Various Scientific Papers Foundational to Alchemy [c. Fall 2006] at
Billy Bunkie the Science Junkie.

Using
Wave Mechanics to Turn Lead to Gold, and Molecular Alchemical Electron Production

Artificial Genesis

href="http://timetravelisforsuckers.blogspot.com/2008/01/you-may-be-interested-in-science-and.html">The
Fruit of the Tree of Life: Yeast Lives to 800 and Florida Scientist Makes an Orange Produce THC

Open
Letter to Dr Mark Kastner, MIT

Thank you, doctors and gentlemen.

William Bunker






The Think Tank
The David Rockefeller Studies Program

The David Rockefeller Studies Program is the Council’s “think tank.” Its work is integral to achieving the Council’s goal of contributing to the foreign policy debate. Fellows in the Studies Program do this by researching, writing, and commenting on the most important challenges facing the United States and the world.

Gary Samore
Vice President, Director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair
+1-212-434-9627
gsamore@cfr.org

Sebastian Mallaby
Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies,
Deputy Director of Studies, and Paul A. Volcker Senior Fellow for
International Economics
smallaby@cfr.org

Janine Hill
Deputy Director of Studies Administration
+1-212-434-9753
jhill@cfr.org

Jerome A. Cohen
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Asia Studies
+1-212-434-9635
jcohen@cfr.org

Elizabeth C. Economy
C.V. Starr Senior Fellow and Director for Asia Studies
+1-212-434-9641
eeconomy@cfr.org

Captain Jeffrey A. Harley, USN
Military Fellow, U.S. Navy
+1-212-434-9623
jharley@cfr.org

Adam Segal
Maurice R. Greenberg Senior Fellow for China Studies
+1-212-434-9745
asegal@cfr.org

Brad W. Setser
Fellow for Geoeconomics
+1-212-434-9639
bsetser@cfr.org

Matthew J. Slaughter
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Business and Globalization
+1-603-646-2939
matthew.j.slaughter@dartmouth.edu

Charles D. Ferguson
Fellow for Science and Technology
+1-202-518-3460
cferguson@cfr.org

-Special notice relating to energy weapons and commercialization of
energy technology.

David G. Victor
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Science and Technology
+1-650-724-1712
David.Victor@stanford.edu

-Special notice relating to US oil dependency and peak oil.

Mohamad Bazzi
Edward R. Murrow Press Fellow
+1-212-434-9736
mbazzi@cfr.org

-Special notice relating to Iran.

Robert D. Blackwill
Counselor
+1-212-434-9888

Steven A. Cook
Douglas Dillon Fellow
+1-212-434-9644
scook@cfr.org

Noah Feldman
Adjunct Senior Fellow
noah_feldman@harvard.edu

Bernard Gwertzman
Consulting Editor
bgwertzman@cfr.org

Joseph J. Helman
National Intelligence Fellow
+1-212-434-9810
jhelman@cfr.org

Walter Russell Mead
Henry A. Kissinger Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy
+1-212-434-9548
wmead@cfr.org

Vali R. Nasr
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
+1-619-339-9192
vali.nasr@tufts.edu

Steven Simon
Hasib J. Sabbagh Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
+1-202-518-3437
ssimon@cfr.org

Ray Takeyh
Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
+1-202-518-3432
rtakeyh@cfr.org

Peter Beinart
Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy
+1-202-518-3436
pbeinart@cfr.org

Stephen Biddle
Senior Fellow for Defense Policy
+1-202-518-3476
sbiddle@cfr.org

Max Boot
Senior Fellow for National Security Studies
+1-212-434-9619
mboot@cfr.org

Isobel Coleman
Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy
+1-212-434-9771
icoleman@cfr.org

Colonel Robert S. Ferrell, USA
Military Fellow, U.S. Army
+1-212-434-9770
rferrell@cfr.org

Leslie H. Gelb
President Emeritus and Board Senior Fellow
+1-212-434-9742; for all media requests call +1-212-434-9460
JZelmati@cfr.org

Richard N. Haass
President, Council on Foreign Relations
+1-212-434-9543; for all media requests, contact Lisa Shields at
+1-212-434-9888 or lshields@cfr.org
president@cfr.org

Colonel Jeffrey B. Kendall, USAF
Military Fellow, U.S. Air Force
+1-212-434-9672
jkendall@cfr.org

Charles A. Kupchan
Senior Fellow for Europe Studies
+1-202-518-3402
ckupchan@cfr.org

William L. Nash
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Conflict Prevention and Director of the
Military Fellows Program
+1-202-518-3423 or +1-202-518-3463
wnash@cfr.org

-Special note relating to conflict prevention

Gideon Rose
Managing Editor, Foreign Affairs
+1-212-434-9629
grose@cfr.org