Tact

US Government, Pentagon, members of the United States House and Senate, members of the American Armed Forces, FBI, CIA, NSA, UN, and international governments and military bodies, this blog is for you. Call Senators: 202-224-3121.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Common Dreams

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/01/1598/

America does not have to fail politically or economically. Nor do we have to commit to non-beneficial military failures, nor fail to impeach felons and treason artists who are against the Constitution.

We do not have to elect another neoconservative federal banker to office, nor do we have to obey him if he gets in the office anyway. Nor does this disobedience mean we are bad Americans, nor does it mean America must do any of the things above.

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Raul Castro is the new leader of Cuba. If I were the Cuban leader I would put a hold on capital punishments and torture. I would begin examination and investment in a new electric car production facility, even if they only produce a few hundred thousand over the life of the factory it would be a proof of concept, and Cuba has some great old cars going. This could help solve their vehicle parts and supply shortage. Even less trained Cubans should work for the state to get it right until they get it right. Use the internet for data. You can learn electronics via wikipedia. Kim Jung, if you're reading this, tell the Cubans.

If you see a 1954 De Soto driving around on electricity you will want to buy one. And so will Americans. So will Floridians.

Being so richly sunbathed, I would begin Cuban harvesting of the sun's infrared radiation with IR-sensitive antennae to turn into electrical power, as shown in the latest solar panel technology breakthrough, at 80% efficiency. Nuclear plants generate ~23% efficiency. However, allied closely with Venezuela and their oil resources, it might have an intermediary effort. Venezuela ad the other 3rd world nations should expand their work in solar power, even though many have rich oil supplies. It won't last for long and you'll want that solar power.

Saturday, February 23, 2008

The money systems of the world are fighting. This makes the tactical edge system and the intelligence and media and public relations and especially the political and election systems of the world little more than tools and weapons. The truth they produce is incidental. We have done nothing to approach the 9/11 open mystery, nor impeachment or removal of major publicly corrupt systems nor the unconstitutional banking institutions for hundreds of years.

Since the end of the Civil War, we've been ramping up to determine which financial and organizational system among humans is the best way to take care of all humans, so none need be enslaved and the true promise of the American and other liberal Constitutions can be fulfilled alongside natural law.

This was the meaning and function of the robber barons and millyards of the 1880's and 1890's. They were technically trying to supply all the material possessions the world could need, but this does not work, and the financial and social systems produced have come to harm us. Colonialism also fails and is similar to slavery. The World Wars 1 and 2 were for similar elimination attempts through imperialism, fascism, a recurrence of racism and human eugenics, ad the systems of communism, and democracy surviving, with fascism being relegated to the 3rd world, creeping back into the 1st by the end of the Cold War, in the name of resource collection akin to the 1880's.

We're at the tail end of that final curl before the true freedom technologies are organized into a global system to eliminate human slavery.

Our militaries are standing forces useful only to further this force of competition searching for the system organizing and dispersing mankind into freedom. That is why they are in Iraq, Afghanistan, and threatening nations all over the world and dominating resources and allies alongside political lines.

We will build and distribute machines that defeat standing laws of physics to provide the resources and power that humanity wants, demands, and has fought and argued for since Eden.

Military might is only worthwhile in a loop between here and that goal. Tactical edge is functionally over.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Letter to Council on Foreign Relations

Letter Sent to Massachusetts Congressmen:

Hello friend! Below please find assorted information about the energy plan that I have preliminarily assessed and potentials and risks about the transition to this new technology that we will need to guide.

http://tacticaledge.blogspot.com/2008/02/view-mailbox-compose-address-book.html


Letter to Council on Foreign Relations about the Infinite Energy Machine:

Council on Foreign Relations

Respected Ladies and Gentlemen,

Thank you for your consideration of my recent email. Thane Heins is added to the list of infinite energy pioneers. He has produced this device with less than $1000 of materials. Affixed to a car or an in-home generator or heating system, or released into the media or ever sold, this could have sweeping economic implications. As scientific data and communications abilities increase this kind of invention will become still more common.

Please consider this article and my publications and the potential consequences and benefits that infinite energy can bring to humanity. A civilization full of enlightened and well studied individuals and communities is precious and worth cultivating and investing in.

I recognize the desire of some secret societies to produce a '500 million person' utopia, in tune with nature. But with this machine that could be done adequately with 50 billion humans and all terrains could be made ecologically friendly and spaciously organized without the clear consequences and instability of producing a 500 million person population. Well known within the scientific community is that on this century's horizon are many advances that could freely and voluntarily make every human a superhuman.

The article:
http://www.thestar.com/Article/300041

Tyler Hamilton
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/columnists/94629

[article excluded from email]

Letter 2:
Western Revelation of High Energy Technology

The greatest incentive to produce this technology is the outstanding increase in economic and organizational capacity that it would bring to mankind. Voluntary organizational systems such as the CFR are more effective than mandated systems or those of pure necessity or coincidence. A world with clean energy without pollution and entirely comprised of these voluntarily associative systems would be well improved above this one.

What are the greatest risks of the proliferation of a free energy machine, presuming as is probable from reference and theory that they do exist behind closed doors at corporations such as ExxonMobil, General Motors, or General Electric, or in the hands of the United States, British, French, or German governments or militaries, or the CIA or another agency?

The greatest apparent risk is the weaponization of this technology. A free energy device could produce wave-bearing electrical weapons of unlimited amperage, the kind which the United States is developing today to use in Iraq. One such device is a high frequency microwave device that can cause a car to explode in a fraction of a second at full power from hundreds of yards away. If any capably minded government or rogue group got access to this device they could quietly prepare for and quickly launch major assaults causing massive and serious damage before adequate responses could be made.

William Reich invented a 'death ray' in the 1920's which Imperial Japan offered to purchase from him in 1938. He politely refused, which may have changed the war. His laboratory was ransacked in 1946 by Soviet spies and he was shot, wounding him. The technology was likely acquired by the US Government and concealed.

These feats have been reproduced in our commercial and military laboratories. Today as atomics, chemistry and string theory are becoming better understood the arrival of more new energy technologies is becoming an increasing probability. The Large Hadron Collider will be online soon and should theoretically be able to produce miniscale black holes, which may be very useful for generation of energy or weapons. The process of wave alchemy popularized with the microwave and custom made in laboratories in 2006-2008 could be converted to easily and cheaply refine weapons grade nuclear material. It may be wiser to begin revealing this technology actively than wait and be surprised by a rogue inventor or faction's disruption, as we have traditionally waited to be attacked or attacked ourselves in American military history. We could just start talking about it.

The economy provides two services: materials/services, and control of these factions and even world governments. Participation and taxation in the industrial/commercial system allows the state and corporations to exercise a level of control over society in a manner similar to good neighborhoods reducing crime rates. Given an abundant supply of free energy, many citizens may reduce their participation in society's labor systems and could no longer require heating oil or fuel, grid electricity, reduce their consumption and raise their productivity in competition with the control economy. Without the fiscal requirement of great cooperation for survival or success, without needing to work so hard to purchase goods and services, many individuals would retire or reduce their workload considerably, or feel able to purchase many goods of various sorts, or to leave society for extended periods or altogether.

"nah whats the point when I can just do something I know im good at and have fun doing it!"
-webizen

The need to use the system to achieve goals could dramatically reduce. Without this traditional cooperation critical shortages in mandatory social functions such as dirty menial and cordial tasks such as cashiering, garbage collection and taxi services, hospital staffing, factory and technician production, mining and agriculture, and others may dry up.

Individuals would be far freer to strike out on their own as business entities and abandon the fields they disliked. The free market might no longer be able to pull society together to provide services in the way it does without the same impetus for money. The severity of these shortages may cripple society.

This process may have already begun with construction of massive FEMA camps in America, unConstitutional private intelligence gathering, military funding, research, engagement, invasion and mobilization to oil and strategic resource areas in the Middle East and testing of public willingness to react to
emergency and other Constitutional studies.

It has been estimated that this switchover revolution will take 18 months. This switchover will be a massive undertaking, a bigger program globally than any in human history, rivaling WW2 in scale.


Scenarios for Transition:

In the best scenario, the state would secretly build up a large supply of these machines and warehouse them alongside emergency goods across the country. They would be guarded and distributed to public businesses as the plans to build them are released through the media and the goods required to build them subsidized, sold, and given by grant through application to any citizen.

Economic conditions would become rosy as people's needs were fulfilled more easily. Technician work would triple immediately and could be met by private and public sectors working alongside to serve the needs of a new publicly driven economy. New pathways would be drawn up and libertarian principles and freedom of intelligence would be adopted as economic conditions spread.

After about 18-36 months this trend would restabilize as a perfusion of the technology throughout society. The new economy would rebuild through every previous institution. Electric and water powered engines would replace ~all gasoline engines and all power plants would be replaced by water or new technology municipal power sources. Central banks would have far less leverage ability, if any, and Federal government participation would become far less crucial while localized economies working together would prosper and have the backing to function independently from the whole. This pattern would cascade down through every world government and institution to the family level, and up from the bottom as well.

This scenario is a rough outline of one of the best possibilities of this revolutionary change. Several risks present themselves, which need to be addressed or rejected.

1. Civilian separatist groups
2. Controlling financial interests
3. Public economic shortage
4. Controlling government interests

These can be compared to the 4 Horsemen

1. Civilian Separatist Groups

Civilian separatist groups may need to be pacified or educated, as releasing this technology to the public will also be giving it to every KKK chapter and every gangland organization.

Legalizing drugs alongside this move would be almost defacto, and preparing our civilization for it today rather than 2 months afterwards may be wiser. Legalizing drugs will quickly drain money from street and jungle gangsters, who are major threats to civilian life and social stability in this environment. Sadly, the techniques of technology repression we've been performing for decades have been weakening our positions in relation to this revelation for over 20 years, from our public education base to our industrial preparedness.

Legalizing drugs may detract from social organization during this period, but we trade that for better armed gangsters on the day of media revelation, when there is a middle ground.

The state, major corporations, the military, and other organizations would face substantial disruption and opposition from the exposure of their guilt in concealing this information and technology for a number of decades if the truth is told immediately. Opposition would likely be quite motivated and further facilitated by the technology itself.

The recognition of this technology's presence will demotivate and devalue the public from using gasoline and other supply chain and chain of command pathways, disrupting our economy which supports the public. Avoiding major crises at the onset +2-3 weeks and +2-3 months will be important.

Members of the public will probably build hundreds of thousands of these devices themselves for private use in the days and weeks following major media publication, alongside legal suits likely filed through FOIA. Many could abort society if given this technology. While their cooperation is not necessary, their additional possible disruption and the local lack of authority they may produce could become important risks. Once this technology is released publicly it will be difficult to measure our public level of risk and unforeseen consequences of discontinuity of supply will be far enhanced. This is likely what George Bush's FEMA camps and semi-suspended Constitution are for, and his enormous ranch in Paraguay.

Months 3-9 would bring this industrial material mass produced to the public and private sectors themselves, likely first to industries and engineering firms seeded and challenged with the information and new grants or loans to produce the machinery itself and devices better using it. The start of this period could face public rioting and other serious trouble as informed people gain proof and access to this technology.

You may also want to examine urban violent crime reduction by meditation as a treatment technique for urban risks. This has been scientifically proven to reduce violent crime by ~1/4.


2. Controlling Financial Interests

Note a letter from Carlyle Group from Fall 2006 that says we will have 'zero liquidity' starting within a 12-24 month window from the release. This window began Fall 2007 and ends Fall 2008. This is likely predicting this kind of a release date, or an economic condition preparing for its release.

Major financial and government players who own this technology already and have worked to suppress it may be planning to release it or prepare the environment for releasing it, as we in the public through scientific and university branches will be discovering it or newer and cheaper ways similar to it 'any day now'. Progressive scientists have made simpler and simpler machines for this, from Nikola Tesla in the 1890's, Dr Moray in the 1920's, Dr Reich in the 1930's, the atomic bomb and other pursuits which dominated the 1940's, UFO elements relative to the Battle of Los Angeles, Roswell, Truman and Eisenhower from the 1950's, an Indonesian scientist's water car and the space program in the 1950's and 1960's, various concealed automobile engine advancements from the 1970's alongside the oil embargo, Stanley Meyer's dune buggy and the 'water ram' from the 1980's and 1990's, and John Kanzius and Thane Heins' special inventions from 2007 and 2008. These inventions have become progressively easier to master, and their intersection with the general public is due for 2008 or 2009, with a real transition period likely taking place from onset until 2012 and beyond.

These giant corporations and world governments are holding onto power by keeping this technology private, to the detriment of our world through war and shortage without it. This technology likely should have been released around 1956-1964 to defend our government organized methodology infrastructure. Our advanced scientists of the day could have helped develop this technology and introduced more safely to humanity at the time. Since we are about 40 years late in introducing this technology, we will be cutting through 40 years of redundant government and social orchestration.

The intentions of these major corporations and the Federal agencies that have delayed introduction for their own reasons is unknown. This is a risk we will be facing as we work to introduce this technology ourselves as liberty and the Constitution and natural law dictates we should, and should have then. Ideally they will work with us towards these goals across all mankind, or not keep us from them.

3 Public Economic Shortage

Public economic shortage is a risk during this transition. If the original best case scenario plan is interrupted by one or more of these 4 problems it is probable that the public sector will experience a serious economic shortage and lack in this transition, which would snowball upon itself unless these machines can be used to produce infrastructure quickly. The most pressing problem will be starvation. Even with plenty of electricity and water, [note Dean Kamen's water purification machine] food still takes a long time to grow.

We will be performing this switchover during a major depression, especially if the switchover continues to be delayed and economic indications are not picked up by excitement about this technology and the new industrial effects it will produce. This will produce the greatest humanitarian aid crisis we will see in our lifetimes.

4 Controlling Government Interest

This is an excellent season for a coup d'etat. Even though this fantastic technology will be available to us and will change the way we build products and move money and organize forever, unknown sinister groups in government may seek to gain advantages at this switchover.

FEMA camps may be used for good or evil. In 1933 world companies attempted to overthrow FDR and install a fascist government in America. A fascist coup using these FEMA camps and our own or Canadian and British military forces could be organized through our existing White House using martial law 'continuity of government' and media control with illegitimate motives. A martial law during this time may actually be a coup. Existing millionaire's clubs have goals of population reduction to 500 million and racist and unequal seniority structures imposed upon mankind that they may devote resources to maintain. This machine is an ultimate field leveling apparatus, and could be seen by some as massively rewarding or empowering those who do not deserve such an honor. Many of those people are anti-humanitarians and prejudiced.

Corporate involvement with governments may become corrupted or motivated by an interest to keep this machine away from populations to maintain monopolies. This is not the duty of the state, and a state that does this is subverted and not working in the interest of We the People. This may be difficult to gauge officially because of the control states have over their own processes of judicial review and their abridging of guaranteed rights.

Effecting justice in these situations will also be challenging and the correct pathway for producing legitimate justice will be guided best by natural law and the Constitution as it stands and not by a forceful organization or suspension of rights.


Thank you for your interest in this topic and in public safety. If all goes well the prospects for 2015 are magnificent. We will see what infinite possibility brings. May it be wonderful.

<>< William






:::Original Version of Email Follows:::








Date Thu, 7 Feb 2008 4:46 AM ( 1 week ago ) Text view

From xxxx@x.xx

To grose@cfr.org, wnash@cfr.org, ckupchan@cfr.org, jkendall@cfr.org, president@cfr.org, JZelmati@cfr.org, rferrell@cfr.org, icoleman@cfr.org, mboot@cfr.org, sbiddle@cfr.org, pbeinart@cfr.org, rtakeyh@cfr.org, ssimon@cfr.org,
vali.nasr@tufts.edu, matthew.j.slaughter@dartmouth.edu, cferguson@cfr.org, smallaby@cfr.org, David.Victor@stanford.edu, mbazzi@cfr.org, scook@cfr.org,
noah_feldman@harvard.edu, bgwertzman@cfr.org, jhelman@cfr.org, wmead@cfr.org, bsetser@cfr.org, asegal@cfr.org, jharley@cfr.org, eeconomy@cfr.org, jcohen@cfr.org, jhill@cfr.org
gsamore@cfr.org, "myself"

Subject:
Council on Foreign Relations and the Infinite Energy Machine


Council on Foreign Relations

Respected Ladies and Gentlemen,

Thank you for your consideration of my recent email. Thane Heins is added to the list of infinite energy pioneers. He has produced this device with less than $1000 of materials. Affixed to a car or an in-home generator of heating system, or released into the media or ever sold, this could be the kind of device I discussed in my previous proposal. As scientific data and communications abilities increase this will become still more common.

Please consider this article and my publications and the potential consequences and benefits that infinite energy can bring to humanity. A civilization full of enlightened and well studied individuals and communities is precious and worth cultivating and investing in.

I recognize the desire of some secret societies to produce a '500 million person' utopia, in tune with nature. But with this machine that could be done adequately with 50 billion humans and all terrains could be made ecologically friendly and spaciously organized without the clear
consequences and instability of producing a 500 million person population. Well known within the scientific community is that on this century's horizon are many advances that could freely and voluntarily make every human a superhuman.

The article:
http://www.thestar.com/Article/300041

Tyler Hamilton
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/columnists/94629

"Energy Reporter
It all began back in 1985, when Thane Heins, having studied electronics at Heritage College in Gatineau, Quebec, started thinking about how magnets could be used to improve power generators.

But it wasn't until after the 9/11 attacks that he started seriously experimenting in his basement, motivated by the desire to reduce our dependence on oil and the countries that back terrorism.

Heins tinkered away, making what seemed like good progress, until one day in early 2006 he stumbled on to something strange. As part of a test, he had connected the driveshaft of an electric motor to a steel rotor with small round magnets lining its outer edges. The idea was that
as the rotor spun, the magnets would pass by a wire coil placed just in front of them to generate electrical energy – in other words, it would operate like a simple generator.

The voltage was there, but to get current he had to attach an electrical load to the coil – like a light bulb – or simply overload it, which would cause it to slow down and eventually stop. Heins did the latter, but instead of stopping, the rotor started to rapidly accelerate.

"The magnets started flying off and hitting the wall, and I had to duck for cover," says Heins, surprised because he was using a weak motor. "It was like, holy crap, this is really scary."

By overloading the generator, the current should have caused the coil to build up a large electromagnetic field. This field typically creates an effect called "Back EMF," described as Lenz's law in physics, which would act to repel the approaching magnets on the rotor and slow down
the motor until it stopped. Some call it the law of diminishing returns, or a law of conservation.

"Lenz's law is essentially magnetic friction, which is a form of resistance not unlike the wind resistance your car experiences when driving down the highway," explains Heins. More friction means more power is necessary to maintain a constant speed.

Instead, the opposite happened. Somehow the magnetic friction had turned into a magnetic boost. Back to the car analogy, it's like the wind moving from the front to the back of the vehicle.

Days later, Heins realized what had happened: The steel rotor and driveshaft had conducted the magnetic resistance away from the coil and back into the heart of the electric motor. Since such motors work on the principle of converting electrical energy into motion by creating
rotating magnetic fields, he figured the Back EMF was boosting those fields, causing acceleration.

But how could this be? It would create a positive feedback loop. As the motor accelerated faster it would create a larger electromagnetic field on the generator coil, causing the motor to go faster, and so on and so on. Heins confirmed his theory by replacing part of the driveshaft with
plastic pipe that wouldn't conduct the magnetic field. There was no acceleration.

"What I can say with full confidence is that our system violates the law of conservation of energy," he says.

"Now, is that perpetual motion? Will it end up being that?""


Thank you, doctors and gentlemen.

William Bunker


Date Mon, 4 Feb 2008 7:11 AM ( 1 week 3 days ago )

From x@x.xx
To "myself", grose@cfr.org, wnash@cfr.org, ckupchan@cfr.org, jkendall@cfr.org, president@cfr.org, JZelmati@cfr.org, rferrell@cfr.org, icoleman@cfr.org, mboot@cfr.org, sbiddle@cfr.org, pbeinart@cfr.org, rtakeyh@cfr.org, ssimon@cfr.org, vali.nasr@tufts.edu, wmead@cfr.org, jhelman@cfr.org, bgwertzman@cfr.org, noah_feldman@harvard.edu, scook@cfr.org, mbazzi@cfr.org, David.Victor@stanford.edu, smallaby@cfr.org, cferguson@cfr.org, matthew.j.slaughter@dartmouth.edu, bsetser@cfr.org, asegal@cfr.org, jharley@cfr.org, eeconomy@cfr.org, jcohen@cfr.org, jhill@cfr.org, gsamore@cfr.org

Subject:
Western Revelation of High Energy Technology


The greatest incentive to produce this technology is the outstanding increase in economic and organizational capacity that it would bring to mankind. Voluntary organizational systems such as the CFR are more effective than mandated systems or those of pure necessity or coincidence. A world with clean energy without pollution and entirely comprised of these voluntarily associative systems would be well improved above this one.

On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:33:09 -0800, x@x.xx said:

Council on Foreign Relations


Respected Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am forwarding this conversation to you on advice from a friend to contact the Council on Foreign Relations. I have heard of this organization before in the context of Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, and Bill Richardson. I request your assistance in sponsorship to the think tank and include research material that could be interesting to you.

Below is the conversation, followed by an extended explanation and links to blogs on other topics. Please consider them and my request for association with the Council on Foreign Relations.

William Bunker


"xxx wrote:
For a man of such a young age, you have a lot of insight into the adversity of our government. You are also young enough to develop more of an impact. I recommend that you try to get sponsored into the CFR...you should know what I mean here. Also, read "Tragedy and Hope" by Carroll Quigley for a professional outlook on the historical development of our societies. The works of G. Edward Griffin are very professional as well. Please don't allow yourself to get caught up in the "conspiracy theorist" attitude like that of Alex Jones. His presentation is foolish and not of sufficient depth.

Here's a good question for you to let me know if you go deep enough:
Do you think WTC7 was a controlled demolition on 9-11?


Good Luck,
xxx


My response to xxx:

Thank you, xxx.

I would enjoy discussing many things with CFR members, but in some cases I find their actions reprehensible. How would a young man become sponsored into the CFR? I found their website and will forward some of my letters to them and link them to my published works and also some videos. I believe I would find being a fellow at the CFR quite enjoyable and similar to my current experiences.

Griffin's work with visible ballots is heartening. I am examining the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in escalating detail in the coming weeks.

WTC7. I have studied 9/11 in great detail. I believe as you say you are testing me for an opportunity. I will not defy the intelligence that I have received in truth without a major sustainable overbearing reason to remain quiet about it, let alone weaken my personal structure by
accepting or repeating known lies However, such reasons to withhold can exist. As I describe in the letter relating to free energy machines, around 18 months would pass from the public scientific release of the first such energy machines and the end of a wave of chaos and destruction that could substantially threaten mankind.

Before releasing this technology from its hiding places it will be necessary to equip mankind suitably to not crush or tear itself apart from having such great power. Keeping this technology away from the public sector until that can be established is important, and I would be willing to advise the CFR or other think tanks seeding world controllers on the best ways to accomplish this readiness and maintain it during the transition.

Irregardless of who has organized WTC7, and the events of 9/11, we can know several things from available evidence. This topic has been well groomed and the event's social and global importance warrant such investigation. The context of events occurring on that day relate in importance to WTC7.

The 47-story building had two fires in upper floors. At around 5pm, after burning for around 7 hours, the building collapsed. At first relative individuals said that it collapsed from the fire, or from gas explosions in the building. Later it came to light that it was ordered
to be demolished by the new owner as of only a few months before, Larry Silverstein, who collected substantial insurance on the property.

As far as forensic and engineering data, a building could not easily or safely be rigged with demolition explosives in only 7 hours. Nor while burning. Nor would it be probable to pull that much attention to the fires on two floors during a nation-wide emergency.

It is quite probable that the building had been rigged with demolition explosives before the plane impacts. Whether this was commercial, as some engineers do this to modern buildings today, such as casino owners, or whether it was in preparation for the day remains to be discovered.

You may know that the Israeli instant messaging service 'Odigo' produced a number of warnings to members 2 hours before the plane strikes that were accurate to the minute. This is direct proof of premeditation of the events and probably incidental to key agents taking places upon the
planes or past security at Logan Airport, and reporting in to their colleagues or being detected and allowed to pass by our intelligence.

We do have the capability to perform this kind of attack on ourselves, technologically and logistically. It is not outside the bounds of possibility that we attacked ourselves on 9/11 to propel ourselves into a social environment and a series of wars and political and economic
conditions aimed at preparing us for this energy technology release or another globe-level structural change event.

This is a very large topic to broach, and doing so in the context of a CFR meeting would be quite attractive to me.

This shift is a massive event, requiring extensive preparation. How would you prepare the world for such a shift?

<>< William"


After this conversation I began considering what steps will need to be taken for this conversion procedure, and what steps may have already been taken by world organizations from midstream.

What are the greatest risks of the proliferation of a free energy machine, presuming as is probable from reference and theory that they do exist behind closed doors at corporations such as ExxonMobil, General Motors, or General Electric, or in the hands of the United States,
British, French, or German governments or militaries, or the CIA or another agency?

The greatest apparent risk is the weaponization of this technology. A free energy device could produce wave-bearing electrical weapons of unlimited amperage, the kind which the United States is developing today to use against cars and other vehicles. One such device is a high frequency microwave device that can cause a car to explode in a fraction of a second at full power from hundreds of yards away. If any capably minded government, or rogue group, got access to this device they could quietly prepare for and quickly launch major assaults against major cities and military establishments from a plane or tower, causing massive and serious damage before adequate responses could be made.

Myths say that William Reich invented a 'death ray' in the 1920's, and that Imperial Japan offered to purchase it from him in 1938. In the context of the globe, he politely refused, although his laboratory was ransacked in 1946 by Soviet spies and he was shot, wounding him. The
technology was likely acquired by the US Government and concealed. In the late 1920's Dr Thomas Henry Moray created a similar machine that resonated with cosmic rays to produce electricity without visible input.

This and other inventions are in technological context to Nikola Tesla's and Albert Einstein's wave theory and atomic advances of the late 1800's and early 1900's, and would be a monument on the scale of the AC motor, radio, television, radar, nuclear fission, the Manhattan Project, and
the Navy's published Philadelphia Experiment, passing a ship 4 hours through time in 1943. These feats have been reproduced in commercial laboratories on smaller scales in the 1990's. [I regret that these works are momentarily uncited.]

As we are continually bathed in energy from the universe and its formation is becoming better understood in atomics, chemistry and string theory, this arrival is an increasing possibility. The Large Hadron Collider will be online soon and should theoretically be able to produce miniscale black holes, which may be very useful for generation of energy or weapons. The process of wave alchemy popularized with the microwave and made custom in laboratories in 2006/7 could be converted to easily and cheaply refine weapons grade nuclear fuels. It may be wiser for world organizational bodies to begin this revelation process actively and have initiative than wait and be surprised by a rogue inventor or faction.

The economic risks of a free energy machine are large. The economy provides two services: materials/services, and control. Participation and taxation in the industrial/commercial system allows the state and corporations to exercise a level of control over
society in a manner similar to good neighborhoods reducing crime rates. Given an abundant supply of free energy, many citizens may reduce their participation in society's labor systems and could very promptly no longer require heating oil or fuel, grid electricity, and could reduce their consumption and raise their productivity of other products. Without the fiscal requirement of great cooperation for survival or success, without needing to work so hard to purchase goods and services, many individuals would retire or reduce teir workload considerably, or feel able to purchase many goods of various sorts, or to leave society for extended periods or altogether, considering the approval rating of Congress and the President.

"nah whats the point when I can just do something I know im good at and have fun doing it!"
-webizen

The need to use the system to pursue and achieve goals could dramatically reduce. Without this traditional cooperation, complex and undesirable or previously disproportionately rewarding services may dry up, causing critical shortages in mandatory social functions such as dirty menial and cordial tasks such as cashiering, garbage collection and taxi services, hospital staffing, factory and technician production, mining and agriculture, and others.

Some of these shortages could be replaced by additional robotic production or additional interest in complex and skilled labor and services enabled by the energy devices, but many would be limited. Individuals would be far freer to strike out on their own as business entities and abandon the fields they disliked. The free market might no longer be able to pull society together to provide services in the way it does without the same impetus for plain money, and a greater demand for complex and interesting goods for and from a newly rich populace.

The severity of these shortages may cripple society and the rewards offered for these jobs may become unfulcrumable and irreplaceable. This would quickly lead to problem number one and become a feedback loop into itself.

The best reason for releasing or preparing for this release of technology now are avoiding being caught by a viral surprise, civil or military. The consequences occurring while prepared for this probability are great but lesser than those of a society and government caught largely unaware. The preparatory actions and resources necessary for such a controlled revelation depend on many possibilities.

Firstly again the invasion of foreign powers and factions. A sufficiently scaled national defense military and weapons useful to countering and preventing this kind of death ray will be necessary, as large scale weaponization could be quite deadly.

Enclaving of foreign powers such as Iran or Pakistan, others in Eastern Europe, China, Russia, North Korea, Indonesia, or elsewhere with this technology could become dangerous. Militaries with time to organize large masses of these pieces of equipment in opposition to one another or the production of satellites capable of producing focused beams on this level of destruction are past spy movie to horror movie level events that could wipe out large populations of mankind and major urban centers.

These and powers like them will need to be attacked or reconciled early upon the release of this technology or they could become the very well armed opposition, the goal result being a mankind united through this power system without energetic or nuclear conflict. Factional groups developing this technology could be eavesdropped upon using remaining telecommunication systems and our well equipped international intelligence agencies and reconciled through our paramilitary and police forces.

Again, this process may have already begun with construction of massive FEMA camps in America, unconstitutional private intelligence gathering, military funding, research, engagement, invasion and mobilization to oil and strategic resource areas, testing of public willingness to react to
emergency and other Constitutional studies, and other internationally coordinating and polarizing events such as over the war in Iraq and other examples of aggression.

Unfortunately this test has been slighted or complicated by the perception of our state leaders and institutional system as corrupt and threatening to democracy by large swaths of the population and numerous instances of failed secret keeping have contributed to a damaged reputation of our government and intelligence agency, which is presumed to be the positive attractor in this polarizing litmus test in preparation for intelligently revealing this technology.

I also invite you to examine my School of Esoteric Magnetic Phenomenon's
research proposal at SOEMP Research Proposal

Various Scientific Papers Foundational to Alchemy [c. Fall 2006] at
Billy Bunkie the Science Junkie.

Using
Wave Mechanics to Turn Lead to Gold, and Molecular Alchemical Electron Production


Artificial Genesis

href="http://timetravelisforsuckers.blogspot.com/2008/01/you-may-be-interested-in-science-and.html">The
Fruit of the Tree of Life: Yeast Lives to 800 and Florida Scientist Makes an Orange Produce THC


Open
Letter to Dr Mark Kastner, MIT


Thank you, doctors and gentlemen.

William Bunker






The Think Tank
The David Rockefeller Studies Program

The David Rockefeller Studies Program is the Council’s “think tank.” Its work is integral to achieving the Council’s goal of contributing to the foreign policy debate. Fellows in the Studies Program do this by researching, writing, and commenting on the most important challenges facing the United States and the world.

Gary Samore
Vice President, Director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair
+1-212-434-9627
gsamore@cfr.org

Sebastian Mallaby
Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies,
Deputy Director of Studies, and Paul A. Volcker Senior Fellow for
International Economics
smallaby@cfr.org

Janine Hill
Deputy Director of Studies Administration
+1-212-434-9753
jhill@cfr.org

Jerome A. Cohen
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Asia Studies
+1-212-434-9635
jcohen@cfr.org

Elizabeth C. Economy
C.V. Starr Senior Fellow and Director for Asia Studies
+1-212-434-9641
eeconomy@cfr.org

Captain Jeffrey A. Harley, USN
Military Fellow, U.S. Navy
+1-212-434-9623
jharley@cfr.org

Adam Segal
Maurice R. Greenberg Senior Fellow for China Studies
+1-212-434-9745
asegal@cfr.org

Brad W. Setser
Fellow for Geoeconomics
+1-212-434-9639
bsetser@cfr.org

Matthew J. Slaughter
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Business and Globalization
+1-603-646-2939
matthew.j.slaughter@dartmouth.edu

Charles D. Ferguson
Fellow for Science and Technology
+1-202-518-3460
cferguson@cfr.org

-Special notice relating to energy weapons and commercialization of
energy technology.

David G. Victor
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Science and Technology
+1-650-724-1712
David.Victor@stanford.edu

-Special notice relating to US oil dependency and peak oil.

Mohamad Bazzi
Edward R. Murrow Press Fellow
+1-212-434-9736
mbazzi@cfr.org

-Special notice relating to Iran.

Robert D. Blackwill
Counselor
+1-212-434-9888

Steven A. Cook
Douglas Dillon Fellow
+1-212-434-9644
scook@cfr.org

Noah Feldman
Adjunct Senior Fellow
noah_feldman@harvard.edu

Bernard Gwertzman
Consulting Editor
bgwertzman@cfr.org

Joseph J. Helman
National Intelligence Fellow
+1-212-434-9810
jhelman@cfr.org

Walter Russell Mead
Henry A. Kissinger Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy
+1-212-434-9548
wmead@cfr.org

Vali R. Nasr
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
+1-619-339-9192
vali.nasr@tufts.edu

Steven Simon
Hasib J. Sabbagh Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
+1-202-518-3437
ssimon@cfr.org

Ray Takeyh
Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
+1-202-518-3432
rtakeyh@cfr.org

Peter Beinart
Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy
+1-202-518-3436
pbeinart@cfr.org

Stephen Biddle
Senior Fellow for Defense Policy
+1-202-518-3476
sbiddle@cfr.org

Max Boot
Senior Fellow for National Security Studies
+1-212-434-9619
mboot@cfr.org

Isobel Coleman
Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy
+1-212-434-9771
icoleman@cfr.org

Colonel Robert S. Ferrell, USA
Military Fellow, U.S. Army
+1-212-434-9770
rferrell@cfr.org

Leslie H. Gelb
President Emeritus and Board Senior Fellow
+1-212-434-9742; for all media requests call +1-212-434-9460
JZelmati@cfr.org

Richard N. Haass
President, Council on Foreign Relations
+1-212-434-9543; for all media requests, contact Lisa Shields at
+1-212-434-9888 or lshields@cfr.org
president@cfr.org

Colonel Jeffrey B. Kendall, USAF
Military Fellow, U.S. Air Force
+1-212-434-9672
jkendall@cfr.org

Charles A. Kupchan
Senior Fellow for Europe Studies
+1-202-518-3402
ckupchan@cfr.org

William L. Nash
Adjunct Senior Fellow for Conflict Prevention and Director of the
Military Fellows Program
+1-202-518-3423 or +1-202-518-3463
wnash@cfr.org

-Special note relating to conflict prevention

Gideon Rose
Managing Editor, Foreign Affairs
+1-212-434-9629
grose@cfr.org

4th amendment

4th amendment, nanorobots, chemtrails = treason.

the american forth amendment says that we are to be secure and private in our effects without a warrant. chemtrails have been used by the nation of germany in their military training exercises. they have also been used over saudi arabia and iraq, during the first and second gulf wars.

when outfitted with nanorobots as described by laboratory reports from www.jonesreport.com which occurred in the American southwest, this mandates the subjection of Americans to 4th amendment violating events.

Saturday, February 02, 2008

If I was planning to release fantastic free energy technology...

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

I encourage others to remain vigilant about our democracy.

We are at risk of never voting again, according to probability accounting systems.

We were very concerned in 2006 and 2007 about the elections process and invading Iran. Now that Iran seems like a non-issue for the time being, we have no rest.

Our 2008 elections are being plotted against and hijacked as we speak. The neoconservative conspiracy is planning to obscure the vote using electronic voting machines. Our candidates are vying to be the figurehead who gets the election cheated from them by martial law.

We are looking at a new 9/11 inside attack occurring if the candidates do not line up as desired by the establishment. And if they do, we are planning to invade Iran at the earliest opportunity and attack the world's middle class and populations with a worldwide economic depression, structured to reduce population.

Monday, January 28, 2008

State of the Union proved it for me.

Friday, January 25, 2008

http://www.terrorism-in-israel.com/blog

Samson Blinded is the unpleasant open-eyed examination of private and secret Israeli state torture, terrorism, hard-faced militantism and dirty and black operations against others in the world. These crimes deserve to be looked at and not swept under a blanket.

This is an effort to eliminate terrible things from the world regardless of who pereptrates them, and to eliminate the demand and stimulus for these things to be done.

It is nice when a poor woman gets aid. It is nicer when she isn't poor.

Samson Blinded

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

We are only a nation because we presume that the government and those around us are helping us and are on our side, pursuing things collectively.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

A Ron Paul presidency is possible and good. The other teams are very likely to be disqualified for fraud and for impeachable offenses before they become elected, and the election process is fraudulent and unreliable. We may also reach conclusions that find that 9/11 and other election frauds from 2000 and 2004 were perpetrated by the same organization that is doubtlessly fronting more candidates for the 2008 elections.

In such an event Ron Paul could become president of whatever is leftover until it is sorted by intelligence and accurate organization in pursuit of humanity's progress and freedom to pursue happiness.

However, if Ron Paul is not president by legitimate means, he has enough voters to form a very healthy and active voters' union. A voters' union is a team of individuals from the 50 states who will work in ways similar to electing Ron Paul to accomplish the same things we would have if he won the presidency.

This can be accomplished with money bombs for programs, mass mobilizations of calls, the funnest political action campaigns and groupings, and many wonderful, massively powerful, and liberty flexing programs to produce stronger and more informed communities, better able to identify and pull for and pursue and produce goodness.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

The Threat of World Anarchy

One of the primary threats to mankind is world anarchy. What is world anarchy? Roughly, it is a world without

1. substantial enforcement of law
2. without stable and well organized systems of amassment of money and goods
3. control of information distribution systems
4. limitation of the kinds of industrial production systems and the tailoring of these goods to enhance control

For example, our automobiles operate using petroleum, which must be refined and purchased. If our automobiles got 100mpg instead of around 20mpg, we would be 1/5 as controlled by this system. This reduces the ability of radicals to subsist and persist without review from primary sources. If their fuel is 1/5 as useful, they will be able to produce 1/5 as much uncertainty. This also enhances our economic involvement with them by 5x.

Similarly, free energy or ambient energy capturing systems would entirely unleash them from energy systems. A radical or dissident or woodsman with a free energy machine would not ever need to rely on us for their energy. They would be unregulatable.

The same goes for systems of industrial production. A machine producing goods without need of a controlling commodity could amass huge quantities of goods or weapons without our knowledge or consent, potentially toppling our economic system controlling the general population who produce goods in controlled factories and trade in a controlled economy.

The same goes for information about this system. A population who is soaked by volume primarily by information suitable to us and inductive to the system is unlikely to leave it, or believe otherwise, or recognize that it is there.

For us, the organization of money and wealth and goods through the corporations, government, and Federal Reserve banks allow us to track and chart and plan our financial/real achievements and goals and to manipulate the economic system in response to any potential change or adjustment in a producing herd.

At the center of this herd is a wolf in sheep's clothing, and an unachievable or unproductive dream, which keep the herd orbiting it and feeding us.

Mankind's fitness level is around 7 billion people. What would the consequences of world anarchy be?

Mankind would probably quickly decline in its commercial ability, from the entrenchment of fuel, monetary, and agricultural systems. This decline would result in fatal shortages and destruction of infrastructure.

Thereafter mankind would probably return with the use of the technologies that could make it free, now no longer guarded nor prevented, and eventually turn into societies of woodsmen with some motivationally oriented social cities or groupings.

Considering the main production for spiritual forces by mankind is electromagnetic fields and some signals, which are influencing and controlling mankind, world anarchy would be a gross loss of fields and result likely in diaspora of spiritual energy from earth and eventually it no longer being a center of spiritual importance.

As mankind is a confluence of forces, enhancing these fields is a priority for God, alien life, enlightened and top mankind, and world spiritual forces. World anarchy would likely not enhance these fields, but it would provide an excellent opportunity for happiness through freedom and a number of very excellent and high energy specialty fields to be produced.

To enhance these yields in general, a selection process will be continuing, in which some humans are routed electrically to centers of refuse and declination, while others are organized and routed to positive fields and effective teams. [from this bottom line, choosing Nazi, Soviet, or American is unimportant].

A self-refining system of individual and social enhancement that produces good magnetic field signal for use by humans and for legit trade by humans to other spirits vs ignorance is preferred. VS evolutionary theft and enforced fitness moulding.

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

I would liken the Israeli state to the Sanhedrin. I do not throw my support unwaveringly behind them. I will support that which is intelligent and good. There are bad Israelis in control.

We cannot afford to guarantee Israel's oil supply, nor the oil supply of any nation. Nor will we defend them unilaterally against 'any enemy', including Iran, Pakistan, and the Muslim world. We will change that area of the world into civility using not our bombs and guns, which will only scar us all. We will use our culture and intelligence and love.

We are fulfilling their evil dream of total control. 11!=12.

"A BBC documentary has exposed that Pope Benedict XVI, aka Cardinal Ratzinger, played a leading role in a systematic cover-up of child sex abuse by Roman Catholic priests.

In 2001, while he was a cardinal, he issued a secret Vatican edict to Catholic bishops all over the world, instructing them to put the Church's interests ahead of child safety."


This may or may not be true. But I believe that it is for the time being considering the context of the information and source and the topic.

Because of this, I am putting the Catholic Church's pope on a preliminary suspension. The next highest Catholic official shall be the one in charge of the papacy until this is examined. A full examination is in order of the Vatican, and the church in general.

I am also ordering an investigation in full of the Rockefeller family and the illuminati bloodline families by the spiritual forces at work here, considering new topics of human sustainability methodology. A purification of the Rockefellers and other families and producing new ideas for human sustainability, freedom, and advancement are on every table.

Sunday, January 13, 2008

http://edition.cnn.com....
-Bush says Iran threatens world security

https://www.technologyreview.com/Biotech/19871/
-New pathogens threaten global famines

http://www.newsweek.com/id/91673
-Bush tells Israel he doesn't believe NIE

http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/?Page=Article&ID=9104
-Israel says Bush promised unilateral nuclear bomb attack on Iran [you owe us one favor]

These guys are blessed, but are the blessings and the planned actions intelligent and humane? We have been producing less food than we eat in 5 out of the 7 previous years. Global starvation is a serious issue. But can we produce more? Would a mere cultural revolution without a cull be enough? Can we study ecosystems and electrisystems closely enough to engineer a positive change without an unnatural cull?

Who would die? How can you pick that? Show me those figures and combine them with the social revolutionary progression.

Speaking of which, just this afternoon I decided to build a dating site slash forum. It will be magnifique.

An excellent web forum on all topics, brief photo album, a few games perhaps, chatroom, IM, email, profile with all manner of fun, ongoing user generated questionnaires, and suggestions for specialization in fields. This could help you find a job and a date. And maybe also loans and online activities and online college programs. This might not be so bad.

Unless it kills you!

I'd like to pray that the blessings given to Bush are accurate to a world where humans are not killed in large quantities on purpose by man or God. Someone has to control population and God is a field in a very good position to do so. Benjamin Fulford said that the Bilderburg Group is another such entity in a position to do so,and they organize wars and such. They check favor or harass earth's population on a systems level.

You should work on making better humans instead of removing the worst. What if an uninteresting but large dating site removed 1% of people every month? They would probably have a better population overall, but then again, was their population so great to begin with? The site is uninteresting to begin with. Make a site that is good enough to not need to remove people who do not 'remove themselves', from a random field. That will be 098.

We're talking special surgery/education up through Los Alamos and Area 51. Make it and you will advance. Don't and you'll kill billions. This might be the best of pride, vs the worst. DG?

Saturday, January 12, 2008

Pakistan. Pakistan is a big problem if you want it to be. To solve it without it being a big problem, first we should want that to be the case, and understand why we want this.

Steering public opinion and group opinion on Pakistani nuclear weapons is important to guarding what events will happen between ourselves and currently unreal attackers. [similarly, unreal risks, some of which have been made terminally orbitting to reality and remain so for intelligible reasons, whose occurence is jointly wrong, and will very probably remain so during the course of non-recognition.]

A deeper purpose than Eden.

Currently Musharraf has control of the nuclear weapons in Pakistan, which is reasonable for the time being and its level of threat to outside and regional forces. Allowing this to continue is reasonable. To deal with the interior threats is a course of action. An election that is true and right would work to solve the problems as Musharraf being replaced by a friendly democracy in Pakistan, which could be used to deal with many Islamic and international issues as well as intraPakistani benefits. I support that.

Reflect this on a world scale.

Magnetic eventualities aligned to be achieved are -11q. Revelations is somewhat -11q to the future, dependent on the goal and the current organizations, which could change. Changing these organizations to become the freedom state vs the control state, 1/0, is important. Control state of 0 is not right because internal desires are crushed and suppressed, and that data is lost, or is later found in group effect and given the opportunity to be signal. Freedom state is very good, and has all feelings produced after being sorted individually, where they interact by field in the world. This is cofriendship. The control state is coservice. Both are good. Freedom of choice to enter either arrangement or to move between them is ideal.

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

The resistance/anti-state movement in America is in response to the clear lies and abuses of law and trust perpetrated by the government. It is also partially for greater freedom or adherence to the Constitution, or to stop wars.

We're really disgusted by the death and deceit and wrongful arrests and invasions of privacy. I almost wish you didn't have the technology to accomplish these jobs.

I don't trust you. You and Israel are the same. God backs you up, but I've seen the bad things you've done, and I am appalled. Your reputation is soiled heavily and you're wasting and misspending and stealing my money and the money of my countrymen. You would claim, off record, that it is necessary to be in Iraq because it's oil or new tech, and new tech will cause problems, so we're extending oil as long as possible, and using Iraq as a very large Strategic Oil Reserve. Fuck you for leaking that.

Your knowledge of how important this is is only modest.

Whatever incidental knowledge you have up there, you should release it quickly to the public so we can either join or remove you.

If it's something like 'we're going to kill everyone except the Jews and those who are with them' then you've got some additional explaining to do. I don't see that outcome as necessary or good.

someone is trying to think to me. it's slowing me down. speak up.

i don't want to kill you either.
don't.

okay we can work on that. but several points.

why are you killing all these people. yes, great, God says kill, go to Iraq, etc. I am not pleased with having to kill folk. Not pleased at all. Did you work with God on this? He's a dude in some ways. You could probably get him to not ask you for this. Don't you know Moses?

George Bush is no Moses.

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Our current administration has been using a special Constitution or another conspiracy or state of emergency to effect a greater global change. The problems of megapopulation appear to be under the handling of large groups of business executives and politicians.

The debate and solutions should be opened up to world individuals. Executives do not have the right to judge and decide the course of human evolution. Each human does, intelligently, and not through liquor, poverty, fertility limiting practices, or other subtle "Darwinism".

Solutions to these crises exist through our technology, and dispersing this technology, even through our massive corporate networks, to the 3rd world and the foreign hemisphere. If we refuse to do this because it would weaken our corporate control, we will become victims of our corporate empires and they will become the worst of what they can be instead of the best. This tide is already advanced, but may be receding.

Sunday, January 06, 2008

World Caliphate

I get the impression that Mike Huckabee is afraid of and believes in the risk of a World Caliphate.

This risk has been artificially produced by our AMERICAN CIA, Israeli Mossad, and the British MI6, alongside major corporations of the world. It is a political tool.

There is no risk of a world caliphate.

Ex-CIA has said that we made Al-Qaeda. Osama bin Laden is the only serious Islamic representative who is marketed as a threat to the world. He is a CIA member because he received medical treatment in an American hospital in Dubai in summer 2001, where he was interviewed by the CIA while wanted for the African embassy bombings. We don't want him. He's our man.

He is blamed for 9/11, which was done by our own intelligence agencies. This and his face make the threat of a world Caliphate an apparition. No islamic terrorists are planning to invade us, except for those whom we orchestrate. We are being manipulated by Israeli intelligence forces to attack Islamic and middle eastern strongholds. Afghanistan and Iraq have been the case. Darfur and Somalia may be orchestrated events and not just timely events, cordoning off the Islamic world as a perimeter.

Iran is the strongest nation in this block, and we're being prompted to attack them by Israel, although the illuminati do not approve according to interviews by interior journalists with Jeff Rense.

We should become free of this menace. We should officially expose the intelligence operations to the public where the situation will be cleansed. Private or non-corporate intelligence is entering this condition of cleansing. Even complex things when not reported on the major money medias can be 'out'.

Either it's no problem, Israel is a global peace threat, or American intelligence forces are a world peace threat. I will not approve of Americans and Israelis plotting a preemptive Iranian invasion.

Saturday, January 05, 2008

Maintain focus on the potential risk originations, from non-state organizations which could be Al-Qaeda or the Bilderburgs.

Al-Qaeda is a group organized by the CIA according to top ex-CIA sources. Bin Laden is an American CIA. America has turned to using non-state sources to affect the outcome of world elections and political campaigns and social programs.

This means everything from blackwater to vote counting agencies such as the Israeli firm, to world economic powers, to Al Qaeda to the media.

The true American government and American and world freedom democratic population of humanity pursue life, liberty, and happiness, and the natural rights given to us by our existence and not by any state nor the tenets of any religion.

Let truth, freedom of unity, progression, freedom of choice, world sustainability, and world liberty reign forever with respect to eternity.

Monday, December 31, 2007

I'd like to help people around the world, but I don't think that government is the way to do it. 'The government' is an old institution, and has become nothing more than a company with a claims department and a very large military and a self-professed right to tax anyone living nearby. They maintain a little bit of land and infrastructure, but dole this right out to other companies living inside it mostly.

They start wars and programs of social control. They try to bring resources to the company from wherever on earth they can find or edge them out.

They elect a President and VP from the engineered consent of the populace, they have a board and stockholders and those individuals decide primarily what to do with this company, not the people.

The way to help people around the world is not with a government. A government should be reduced in capacities that it has acquired. We're playing with our foundational systems to get our companies to be more profitable. This will upset people and kill folk.

I've been doing this kind of thing with physics and electrical engineering. Some things are pretty good and should be studied far more before getting creased. But these ideals and goals will be continued in new ways, will not be forgotten, and will be studied continually and will be visited again.

We can probably do a much better job of accomplishing and organizing the world, associating with goodness and good things, and dissolving evil from our experience.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

There is no World War 3.

We have nothing to fight but ourselves. We have no desire to fight. WW3 is an empty threat. Do not stab yourself or another and you will have peace.

I will not send nuclear missiles or men to fight any enemy, but that I need to defend myself or my land. No one will come to fight me, and I will be here and do the do that needs doing.

I'm happy with my job and building my family and intelligence and I am satisfied to do this in pursuit of righteousness until the conditions are two blessed hemispheres of peace. Then we'll do it. Then I will teach conscious temporal electronics at college.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Global Electoral College

George Bush and the neocons are addressing a fundamental concern to the state of humanity and the Constitution. The problem of the electoral college and the hijacking of the state by a mob populace.

In what is satanic irony, they are doing this themselves as a mob, and violating the nature of the Constitution and the rights of the American people that they would technically try to defend in doing so.

The world is running out of resources and is being filled with potent and well technologically equipped populations. If Americans or humans are allowed to do as they please, the neocons believe that humanity would crush itself under organizational errors and resource shortages.

This is the function of monopoly, not an intelligent well informed society.

Look at the massive review our society is conducting of corporations and the president and everything they can possibly get their minds on. They would surely be a very well equipped tool for securing their own fate, but for the factors working against them in 'the corporate monopoly' trying to make them mindless consumers, and the factors in government trying to maintain them and minimize their power.

The only real threat, then, is upsetting a bees' nest somewhere in the world by this massive power of review.

If we reviewed Chinese products in a way that made China so angry they attacked us or stopped doing business with us, that would be a negative and could be our downfall, if we lost such a tyrannical altercation. But that probability is infinitely low because of our dynamic review process and our massive military might, moralized by review, and not by bloodshed or arrogance.

This globalist electoral college and special Constitution are a terminal order. Disobey them, and not just disobey them, but work to decapitate and identify the order. A captain given an illegal order does not merely ignore it, he reports it and prepares for it to not be obeyed.

What would be a difficult transition of this process?

Examine the technology we have. Examine the withheld technology.

We could accelerate the leak process as we accelerate our populace's review potency. What will this behemoth review? That can be guided by its own intelligent watchdogs and corporate and media and government forces that join it openly.

===================

Resource shortages may be a front for global population reduction to spawn conflict. We have infinite technology capabilities, but also many bad and poisonous seeds in our culture. An illegitimate or potentized mob dissent procedure that would overrun organized society is the main concern of releasing this technology.

How can this be prevented, as it is the only thing standing between us, the forces of good, and evil?

We can begin by *enhancing* public review and power, in time for Ron Paul, instead of smearing them and obfuscating their ability to intelligently review. Give them the incentives to think in a free way. Would an economic boom do this job? It certainly could if done right. That would be a peak of culture and in that high tide we could untie many knots and reveal in study the ways some knots are wrongfully tied. That is an acceptable practice that will help those lies no longer be made, and help us not need them, or need them in far fewer situations at far lower concentrations. Sometimes lying can save lives.

Is the cia$media's lie to the public saving lives here? No. The public are the tool of righteousness that we are and defend. By enhancing the public's abilities we can reap massive enhancements of scale quality and power. This would diminish the monopoly state and big money and big mouth organizations have, which is *the only loss* from this process. Other existing losses such as dictatorship would also disappear.

Whatever process got us into the situation is error. Fixing it is one thing, but fixing the system is the bigger blot.

===

If you want freedom, just remind someone that they too want freedom.

===

Let us build new ways that we can both enhance the power and intelligence of the general populace of humanity and reduce or control the risk of illegitimate review. Legitimate review should override illegitimate review, as should justice, equality, and intelligence. Beyond that it appears to be sitting or fighting which are unlikely unless we're making someone fight, unless we join together or use love, which are reasons people would suffer together rather than fight, or by preference or to sustain themsevles from greater suffering, which are less attractive. [-10: 11,12,13,14]

Other cultures in the world can advance. Just because we're American and the richest doesn't mean that other cultures don't strive too, and successfully. We have been the most successful because we have the best resources and social systems and have won major wars and become the seat of global investment for a time, though now it is China, stifled by their social systems and other resources, which they are improving.

Yes, it's that serious.

We can improve ourselves by advancing our social systems once again and by giving ourselves the technology we are withholding, which will then spread to them. This will give them great technology and reduce their resource limitations observably, possibly making them a major industrial power with a poor social system set. We should enhance Chinese social systems before/as we are switching on the power, and also enhance our own economy and systems.

Elucidation: We could win or avoid a war with China. A powerful China does not need to be something bad. Make it that way. CIA spring into action!

Do it as you do the American problem. Also, I recommend subsidizing me. I would not mind getting an envelope in the bushes, or the mail, and an email identifying its location. I am not a contract man but this could be a good event chain. I will not be paying taxes, though.

"Psychics will lead dogs to your body."

I've been called a medium often, by ghosts.

Yes, I recognize the risk by being CIA, even as a contractor. The Chinese secret societies are different and might kill folk. Well, don't mess up. So might you, in error. I can advise you in greater global peace from inside than outside, although both capacities may be large. As a lens working with an intelligence society is a good idea. No shots. I hope to reduce bees nest risk and enhance world honey. What else is there? My ways are good.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Change your ways.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

A Shift in the Winds

Hospitals prepare for the full moon. We should prepare for 2012.

We're moving through a period during which our electromagnetic energies, which are influenced by the moon and other astronomical bodies, as well as social output, are being reorganized.

We currently live in a society that is actually a battery. It is formed by concentric circles to house biological amperage and frequency. These electrical principles influence and guide individuals and nations. In the coming few years surrounding 2012, spanning over about the next decade, this battery will be switched from one kind to another in a way that it hasn't done for at least 2000 years, and more probably 10,000 years.

The new electrical formation will focus on individualism and be a far clearer picture than what we experience today. Clarity and focus as well as independence should wildly flourish in society. I expect this to be expressed in nations all over the world in the form of socialist and libertarian movements and progressive revolutions of sorts. Depending on the expression of the field, it could be one massive movement or hundreds of microrevolutions.

The world's and society's electromagnetic field itself is changing. There is no one to kill to prevent this, and no amount of money piled up will help. We are entering the period of the libertarian world revolution, backed by trillions of amperes of force, and nothing known to man can prevent it.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

One World

When the public finds out about the state's collusion efforts among corporations and megacapitalists, their research and operations into alien contact, their economic colonization and organization of the world at large, [minus closed china, and reforming opposition russia and their strings] they will flip out.

This revelation should occur sometime in 2008, certainly before the presidential election. The imperialists are not relying on winning the 2008 presidential election. Therefore they likely will be stripping America of its power to thew best of their ability.

At the same time, corporations will be conglomerating into a single megacorporation that controls all of the world's important companies. This corporation views state governments and militaries as active fiscal entities and will be able to wield great force to change and affect them. They will likely buy or buy around/fiscally landlock around every world government. They will continue to use the governments they control as marketing wings for their authority systems.

We should immediately eliminate or reduce state authority and center the origin of authority and power on the individual. When the corporations come to wield state government authority they will have a reduced amount of strength and greater law and social public understanding to overcome.

Promoting and switching to libertarianism using the good American national forces available to the world's do-gooders will bring the best outcomes at this point.

Those in corporate power would seek to enhance their profit taking by the business model, and likely enact their plans of 500 million humans living in harmony with the planet, which is technically energetically degrading and unstable and involves the deaths of 6.2 billion humans. They will be stopped.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Sizzler Missile

The sizzler missile has excellent technological features. A large subsonic missile approaches a target and at 10 miles fires a smaller item that goes mach 3 and zigs its path. it also flies no higher than 33' above sea level, well below radar.

The math:

I want this slow missile to fire 6 such minimissiles, not 1. I want it to optically and laserally track the height of waves to fly lower, and to have subaquatic capabilities with mini radar and sonar to find the ship and hit it from below water and avoid above-water challenge threats. I am disappointed that this will make it more jammable, and it should produce and record measurements periodically to go with the last best if it does get jammed.

Furthermore, I want it never to be used.

I want countermeasures to these missiles. Someday. Normal radar and [sonar] jamming, early warning radar detection propped buoys on leashes around the ship, perhaps with modest infobits and projectile countermeasures, maybe emp pulsers, unmanned aircraft anti-missile radar correspondance and laser tracking as well as confetti launching.

We could put separated thin hulls a few meters out from the ship's hull, but i suppose they'd be easy to punch. maybe if those metahulls could launch explosively shaped projectiles at incoming objects...

...or be defensively explosive.

It'd be a good fight. Currently the Gulf fleet would be toasted. This article coming out must indicate that we do not plan to succeed in the Gulf if we attack and are counterattacked by Iran and Russia. This would then say that we will not attack, unless we are ready for heavy losses.

Thursday, November 08, 2007

$

Russia and America, Oil and Dollar
Co-Posted in www.receiptforlabor.blogspot.com

I am seeing some possibilities. They are nothing more than possibilities at this point. Although they have been speculated upon to modest degrees they are injustice.

America took Iraq. They took Afghanistan. Now America has been planning to invade Iran. While internationally weighing the wargames of this scenario and the industrial peak oil consequences of such a disaster, Russia announced that an invasion of Iran would be seen as an invasion of Russia. This has stalled American efforts at an Iranian invasion and complicated an American/Israeli/Saudi oil monopoly.

Americans may have been counting on using this potential monopoly or political capital from terrorism and war to leverage key military, financial, and industrial circumstances in future engagements which will not either not happen or happen much later, or a slight chance of soon but more dreadfully. It is more probable now that Russia and China will come into swing on the middle eastern and Indian/Pakistani topics and into the world economic and industrial and resource oriented scene.

Similarly, all three major players and Europe will be experiencing a massive cultural and political revolution regarding libertarianism as China falls to a social revolution sometime in 2008 or 2009, and Russian president Vladimir Putin faces a Russian Constitutional crisis in 2008, and America experiences the Ron Paul revolution into 2008 and other media projects, and Europe works with Islamists and sustainability through the decade.

Financial crises seem inevitable. The American dollar will crumble and collapse as it has been abused **in preparation for the Amero to replace it**. Get on the stick, CIA.

This should roughly coincide with a world oil crisis as peak oil comes to pass. New Brazilian crude could lighten the disaster, but will not nearly prevent it. Ron Paul and Alaskan and other energy infusions will come too late, but aid after the disaster hits, pinpointed perhaps 4-10 months from now, in time for the 2008 elections.

Russia has allegedly been working politically in the Middle Eastern regions to strengthen their position in respect to a potential Iranian invasion, particularly in Georgia and Jordan. China appears to be enhancing their hegemonic tendencies while softening to a revolution that could engulf the region.

China has collected even more dollar notes, rising the total to $1.45 trillion, up from 1.3 trillion shortly beforehand, and that up from 900 billion seemingly 6 months ago. The USD has fallen against the CAN and world currencies and oil and gold, and London revised upwards their futures estimates for gold for 2008 and 2009.

An oil shortage would be disastrous for humanity. Some 60% of our oil is used for agriculture, and our food reserves have dropped what appears to be 6 out of the past 7 years since 1999. Oil supply is tighter than any time other than 1980 and 1973, and oil prices have reached record highs at some $97 a barrel, up from $20 a barrel back when we had a meaningful food surplus. This price may be artificially inflated due to dollar weakness.

A war in Iran would be disastrous for humanity. It would precipitate an immediate oil shortfall of millions of daily barrels and war between America and Israel, and Iran and Russia, with China ringside leaning communist.

What is Japan doing in the meantime?

Goals:

Leave Iraq
Impeach Dick Cheney and George Bush
Reopen 9/11 Commission in light of NIST and other evidence
Investigate the 1000 most powerful humans and their conspiracies
Ban AIPAC from America
Secure non-oil energy supplies and farming
Elect Ron Paul president
Expose corporate media
Train Americans in non-violent revolution and civil action
Other secondary goals.

These factors are tactically valuable to producing a sustainable nation during this extended rugged period. Sustainability is strateigic in this environment.

Sunday, November 04, 2007

x

It appears that you members of the intelligence community, you actual spy networkers reading this page, have two choices. You may become part of the Bilderburg Group's 500 million expected human survivors after this near future era. Your kids might be too. You are working to make it happen. You may know about the Bilderburg Group and the Council on Foreign Relations or other such organizations, you may not. Studying what they do and where you fit into it and what they rely on and control is wise.

According to science that I have watched the pioneering research into and proofs of concept, this population number is arbitrary. The control systems surrounding it are not necessary. Advanced science can allow humanity to sustain itself at current population levels and beyond.

Additional study can allow us to organize and provide for the way humanity works and the working of the human, without controlling humanity. Controlling humanity is the greatest challenge the NWO faces, as humans will never allow such conditions to be maintained worldwide and media will be unable to convince them that the losses of billions of lives due to infrastructure failures are accurate or unexpected. The backlash from this would be devastating.

Alternative to that, we can provide a new future for humanity of world freedom and capability without forced choices or human slavery or population decimation. If you do not think you or your children or family will be part of the 500 million or do not want to have such changes occur, study the topics pertinent to this change.

David Rockefeller says in his personal memos that he wants to destroy the United States of America.

The satanistic dream he has of an aggressively classist future world is unsustainable.

Pakistan

I denounce Pakistan's state of emergency and suspension of their constitution. Their neighbors do not have this emergency. There is nothing going on in pakistan, except the election, that would cause the state of emergency. Musharraf has toppled his own country in order to maintain his own selfish power control.

Friday, November 02, 2007

See if you can use this magnetic map of Europe to find properties or clues to events in WW2, racial stereotypical characteristics, colonial seat and imperial sentiments, and other events based on the numerical and color hz data in www.timetravelisforsuckers.blogspot.com.

Consider that this field is made of humanity as well as minerals and animals and geological properties. It may also affect humanity. As humans grow greater in magnetic hz on the whole and as individuals these stereotypical fields will not surround them or influence their decisions so greatly.

We should stop this foolish fighting over resources and begin farming these resources in a way that will not enslave living things, ourselves or others.

We will bring out the technologies of energy and use them to produce whatever goods it seems we need.

We must examine the arc of society and examine the places which have fallen most starkly, some into deep chasms. We should study the occurance of these things and prevent them from happening using powerful scientific/marketing focus. The worst 1% of the population cause many of the most serious problems, and indirectly the most problems.

Simply jailing these people is not sufficient. They will spend perhaps 10 years there and then be returned to society. Someone else in society has likely taken their place when they leave. We need to fix those parts of the dam and rearrange social flow to moderate weakness, or without new inputs, which are shrinking comparatively, we will become overtly terminal.

Energy technology will reduce some of the expression of human weakness, but the weakness itself may still be inherent in other situations. We should examine the inner workings of social and mental function. The easiest and best way to do this is electromagnetically, on a minute biological scale.

If you with the money are not paying a group of individuals to do this and study these topics with access to the best laboratory and medical material we have, then give me the money. I already am doing it and you will help me.

I want 12 of the best psychics in the world to gather in Washington and do with the 12/13 what 4000 meditating monks did to violent crime over a summer, but full time non-employment sustained dedication and to the world and mankind.

I want a group of these in every city to act as conveyors or conductive groups to dispense em function to mankind. They should be headed globally in archwork webwork quasi-authority patterns to detect fluxuations and nuance in themselves, headed by a ring and a member. This ring and member should rotate, and be copied.

Those who react with force, anything 11^, should be dealt with. Others are not criminals and are to be tried like females would try a person socially.

Pentagon

The defining events in the war on terrorism are not going to be physical violent victories. They will be industrial and economic and social victories, which the state and the war are actively striving *against* right now.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

WARGAMER

Good luck on your wargamings.

I am prepared to commit to an America that has no war on drugs, no IRS, no foreign committments in Iraq or Korea or other places.

Militarily, we're an economic body. No place in the world can meaningfully overtake a nation or man or idea and hold it by force if the people do not want it. To desire this is inconsequential.

The military's hands are tied by the massive retaliation that would come fiscally and by population from a wrongful war or series of wars, in their own country and others, but that they be sustainable. Being unsustainable, possibly by relying on oil, is a great weakness and to enhance it is to grow weaker.

Let's economically marketgame the shift and restructuring of our industry from a control-state to a free-state using free-energy and with Constitutional social policies.

Begin.

US supports Egyptian Nuclear Program over Iranian

The United States has been quietly supporting a nuclear program in Egypt, while it has been threatening to invade Iran over its nuclear program. Hans Blix and UN representatives have been unable to show that Iranians are working on an aggressive nuclear bomb, while our military policies have been advanced in aggression.

That aggressive program is the problem. Wherever this aggressive program exists, that is where the terrorist is. Currently, it is America, and its policies and force strategies in the Middle East.

Friday, October 26, 2007

Russia <3 Iran <3 Love

"(02:07:05 PM) hesnotaduck: you also may be interacting with me subconsciously
(02:07:34 PM) hesnotaduck: it can become like a television show playing softly in the background, energetically stable unto itself
(02:07:55 PM) hesnotaduck: i beleive psilocybin and other psychadelics disrupt the stability of these mental shows or dialogues
(02:08:06 PM) hesnotaduck: giving you massive amounts of new data
(02:08:10 PM) hesnotaduck: hence the trip"

===

Russia has signaled that an attack on Iran will be seen as an attack on Russia. THANK GOODNESS this will substantially slow or stop the neoconservatives' pushes for war and to battle for the world's resources. This friction should produce substantial pieces of evidence suitable for progressing the world's populace to enlightenment about the duties asked of elite socieites.

Furthermore, this primarily bans an attack on Iran, since it will disrupt the world and American voters, candidates, and international agents recognize the new risks involved. How would the American neoconservatives behave now that they do not have the potential to invade Iran so easily?

They could invade anyway and begin a tense situation, where Russia will probably have troops and hardware committed to Iran but initially limit a nuclear engagement. This shifts the global environment of an Iranian invasion and the American fascio-corporate attempt to conquer the world by monetary dominance and military actions to support that dominance based on natural resources, finance, and infrastructure, instead of unite it in peace by voluntary association of all people.

Relying on or exploting weaknesses you find in other people instead of helping to heal them is evil. Doing so weakens you and makes you evil.

I support Russia in this move, but I do not respect elements of their anti-deomcratic procedures. I also wonder what George Bush will do after having regarded the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist wing, now allied with the state of Russia. Does this make Russia a terrorist organization, Mr Bush? According to the normally approved math that you have professed, yes it does. However, I expect that you will not affirm your own math, and your retraction from the aggressive moves you have made will doubtless expose you and your motivations.

This move expedites and cements the probability of a Sino-Russian counter to an American invasion of Iran in pursuit of world resources.

Russia or China might be wise to attempt to acquire or release energy technology resources that would revolutionize the global energy industries, despite the lost potential from economic sales of their own or their neighbors' natural resources, benefits given by proxy to their perceived current enemies, adjusted future production potential ratios, or loss of control from comparative fiscal security of being energy exporters. The economic oil based growth of our world industries and markets cannot be sustained using the natural resources we currently have for much longer than a few years' time. Fighting over these resources would be a substantial loss of markets and infrastructure for any player.

Any secret society hoping to Dr. Strangelove the earth is at substantial risk of being killed regardless of their status and will emerge into an unsustainable ethical social and physical environment in the future with or without their potential comrades.

It would be far wiser to engage the libertarian revolution of not needing to care what other people think or want because you do not rely on them, which is a condition that the majority of elite people recognize will occur within 10-30 years regardless of path, with a fuller world than a lesser world, and with fewer murders rather than more.

Also consider the electromagnetic effects of the potential deaths of 3-6 billion humans. That is not beautiful. Consider the wonderful possibilities of these humans undergoing the world's greatest revolution ever, and the fine place we all would be in at that point. If you elite think you have some positive company or social market opportunities and project comanagers now, begin work on enhancing the experiences and lives of those around you who may become your new growth partners.

The world can change.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Letter to the World's Organized Elite Societies

http://someonespinchingmythirdeye.blogspot.com/2006/10/letter-to-worlds-organized-elite.html

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Iran != Iraq

This article in Esquire says that Iran will be Iraq all over again, which is bad enough coverage, but it will not be Iraq all over again for it will be worse. Far worse.

We've been suckered into Iraq. Being suckered again, deeper into the quicksand, would be attacking Iran.

Iraq was producing nothing that we needed at the time. Iraq produced only a few barrels of oil annually in a market condition that was not so tight. They were not a serious threat, and we could have waited on them for a long time. However, controlling that oil in time for peak oil 2008 and also having a good foothold for Iran and the 2004 and 2008 presidential races was of critical timing.

Iran is producing large amounts of oil. They make ~3mbd and the world uses and produces ~90mbd. Our market is so tight that oil prices are currently around $90 a barrel. Attacking Iran would leave us in a fuel situation that would produce shortage, which we haven't seen since 1973. Prices would triple and then later double. This would not be merely a shipping error, like someone holding your pants in a crimp so they are too tight, like in 1973. This would be plain growing out of your britches, partially because of a 3" reduction in their size as Iran stopped exporting oil due to military threat.

How would this be beneficial to the ones who have opened this pandora's box? Those who would invade Iran on purpose, knowing these negative fallouts and the unnecessary status of the war, knowing who really [in the governments] did 9/11, how will they benefit? They have set themselves up prior to this shortage to own a majority of the world's oil resources, and to have them guarded adequately. They also profit from the Iraq war now. They are some who seek world domination and to win the fiscal inequality we are constantly in against shortage. They would do this by gaining control of the world's resources and eliminating a majority of the world's populace.

From that point, they could manage the world's resources sustainably, probably using ancient technologies as 'sustainable' measures such as nuclear power, a labor class, and accounting for a large portion of the world to be unusable afterwards.

Little do they realize, although they may have planned well for their heinous crime, that our technologies and the hidden techs are quickly elevating to allow our current world to be sustainable, with all 7 billion people, were they properly trained. They have been working to train this world to be slaves or idiots instead for about 60 years. Had they been training for good, we would be there in about 2 years.

The reverberations of their murderous actions and plans will not rest. Their utopia, which is impossible and would collapse if it were attempted, would be beset by their emotional fallout. They would not deserve it, and it will not happen.

Doubtless, if we invaded Venezuela, China would take responsive actions. A similar situation probably exists with Iran. Russia also becomes the watchdog over the entire world, even if we do act and win once on a major scale or locally, Russia will respond and win.