Pakistan. Pakistan is a big problem if you want it to be. To solve it without it being a big problem, first we should want that to be the case, and understand why we want this.

Steering public opinion and group opinion on Pakistani nuclear weapons is important to guarding what events will happen between ourselves and currently unreal attackers. [similarly, unreal risks, some of which have been made terminally orbitting to reality and remain so for intelligible reasons, whose occurence is jointly wrong, and will very probably remain so during the course of non-recognition.]

A deeper purpose than Eden.

Currently Musharraf has control of the nuclear weapons in Pakistan, which is reasonable for the time being and its level of threat to outside and regional forces. Allowing this to continue is reasonable. To deal with the interior threats is a course of action. An election that is true and right would work to solve the problems as Musharraf being replaced by a friendly democracy in Pakistan, which could be used to deal with many Islamic and international issues as well as intraPakistani benefits. I support that.

Reflect this on a world scale.

Magnetic eventualities aligned to be achieved are -11q. Revelations is somewhat -11q to the future, dependent on the goal and the current organizations, which could change. Changing these organizations to become the freedom state vs the control state, 1/0, is important. Control state of 0 is not right because internal desires are crushed and suppressed, and that data is lost, or is later found in group effect and given the opportunity to be signal. Freedom state is very good, and has all feelings produced after being sorted individually, where they interact by field in the world. This is cofriendship. The control state is coservice. Both are good. Freedom of choice to enter either arrangement or to move between them is ideal.