Tact

US Government, Pentagon, members of the United States House and Senate, members of the American Armed Forces, FBI, CIA, NSA, UN, and international governments and military bodies, this blog is for you. Call Senators: 202-224-3121.

Saturday, March 31, 2007

Radon

Is this world war situation what you want? To see where you can group the most bundles of explosives and machinery? That you can control the ambient resources of a place without meaningfully or responsibly nurturing them, or the people who rely on them?

Granted, the maturities of the revolutions of the 1920's and 1930's battled for hegemony and the industrial winner would control the world until the current day, producing dramatically different late 20th century/21st century outcomes. It is good that fascism lost and democracy and communism won a lasting place in the world, but these are mature fighters battling, not the ideal fathers, nor ideal childhoods, which are necessary for sustainability [green or death] (cake or death). From the top, these sources are difficult to adjust, and as not being socially sustainable, are terminal and temporary scablike social frameworks. Democracy, having documentation pursuant to adjustability, is a likely candidate for minimal disruption. Unfortunately, the wild fiscal and hegemonic disparities of an uneven democracy at the end stages of unsustainable origination function in a way similar to fiscal fascism. Fascism would be crushed.

Communism, having similar and perhaps even greater sustainability, but with very poor documentation and culture, will be badly broken. However, the communist cultures seem remarkably socially unsustainable and violence oriented. That will degrade itself far more in more probably unsustainable ways.

"These primary biological functions are the most basic form of change given to a human. A painless effective existance modded by technologies is standard. What happens after that is the true judgement."


"University of I am not a hamster, and life is not a wheel." -University of Phoenix commercial.

What do you want to do? You can do anything, and you go to Iraq. To Iran?

These cultures are becoming prepared to make the switch from nonsustainable oringal culture to the new single sustainable culture post communism, post capitalism, post materialism. It is probable that both cultures will remain to the technological revelation of sustainability.

Are we being harassed socially into this technology and social resolution by artificial necessity? We could have done that in 1994. That was the time of my pappy, and Mr. Cobain probably made much of that decision. Then it could have been unity. Now it will be -2[0]- division.

===

I've often said 'do not cause war because it is wrong'. I like math, but lives are better. What will it take to make the peace of a world? Simply blocking war will not enforce true peace, nor peaceworthiness. That is a social condition that requires enlightenment and love.

Let's do some endgames. Do not cause war.

US attacks Iran. Iran busts its oil productions. World begins experiencing peak oil immediately. Major companies adjust earnings statements for 3rd, 4th qtr, well into next year, commodities, futures, currencies, all drop. Net loss is *gross*. $10-20 Trillion disappear into nothingness. World production plummets that day, maybe the day after. Iran has the ability to wage a longer and tougher war and more international resistance than Iraq has. The enlightenment of the American populace is greater and the American state is in a precarious condition. Iran's potential nuclear program and probability of cooperation of international allies and Western neighbors is unknown. America's military is already very poorly maintained and strained, and numerous war crimes trials are pending as well as intramilitary fraud cases. We would probably find few allies or even Americans to invade with, as we are in danger of being found in The Hague, and prewar eventology considering the "Gulf 2" British open fraud fiasco [another Haugeworthy event].

We still have Iraq right next door. Also right next door to Iran is China. Would China allow us to intercede in Iran on their border? It depends on the conditions. If we worked with China to oust North Korea, that game could be over quickly. But in 1950 and 1967, China did not take kindly to American wars near its land. China might provide substantial assistance to Iran if we invaded them, or worse. They also might choose not to help finance our war. One of the major financiers of the indebted American economy and therefore the Iraq war is actually Chinese national banks lending us money. The war might be a key time to cinch back American credit and sell some dollars, or a few hundred billion dollars [www.receiptforlabor.blogspot.com].

Invading Iran would not be a good idea, and could topple a major Western democractic power, leaving a stronger dictatorship/communism and a wildly victorious grassroots Islamic fundamentalism in its place. America has some things to do before/instead of committing urban suicide. We need to facilitate the transition from nonsustainable original society to sustainable purposeful culture using our technology/wealth/culture. War is not the purpose.

Peace and love are fantastic.

Halliburton is in open violation of its contracts in Iraq. If the USM will not open a lawsuit, or court martial, against the company, individual soldiers must file suit against them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeIxHQ-lkuM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHg-MQPfGFQ

63 of 67 water processing facilities in Iraq were not within code.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Rosie O'Donnel on The View

Rosie O'Donnel on Iran and Building 7

Who better than Rosie O'Donnel?

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Restore The Constitution

Patrick Leahy's restoration of the Constitution will bring back [on paper] our right to Habeaus Corpus, ban on torture, and association with the Geneva Convention. Note that due to the authority in our Constitution and Congress, none of these tenets were ever legally repealed. The Constitution has not been changed, and the 4th amendment has stood forever on paper. Congress passed a ban on torture long ago, and did not unpass it. The Geneva convention is an international agreement that the president does not have the authority to remove us from without Congressional approval [as well as the 1972 ABM treaty].

The law says that we are to try these people for violating the Constitution, defying the Constitution's division of powers by present office without negotiating the Constitution, and for the various unConstitutional acts performed by the president and agencies.

Two conflicting laws passed by Congress shall be negotiated before passage. The actions of the president and the standing law of the Constitution are overlapping in many places. These two houses are to be reconciled.

Labels:

Vladmir Putin and Russia

Viciously purified metals are very brittle.

"We're in the end stages of investigating impeachment. We're monitoring several high profile global financial groups, imcluding the WTO. We're examining post-op political conditions for probable related arrests in politics and industry... Looks like you're already on the job, agent."

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Green or Death

China: still hot. They build their *own* railroads, too. They'll never make it to the top slot with those human rights abuses and technology secrets, though. With their state-run corporations, they just might be the first to break into a free energy economy and destroy capitalism, socialism, and communism in one blow.

USA: Bush is out. Iraq is out, except for the old white haired guys on the hill. Iran is out, except for the same. Hillary and Obama are both out and neither is an interesting candidate for some office. On the table: free energy or nothing, and its subsequent economic and social reforms and sustainability, war reform, healthcare for all, police/drug law otc and banned reform, constitutional restoration, freedom of migration, traffic law reform, coke.

Iran: It's Honda, or build it yourself.
Iraq: Who is George Bush?

Lebanon: Yeah, we're still watching.
India: Un-sell out. Nice culture. Dig China.

Russia: big plans for oil? i hope they are righteous.

EU: Good deal with CO2 reduction. Tell that Virgin company to look at the $25 million prize. Keep up sustainability and you may survive. Keep and eye out for Peter Romanus.

Chavez: Insults do not work. We love you.
Cuba: You're interesting. May you be effective and advance culture and civics. For love's sake, stop shooting people.

Japan: Stop whaling. Examine oceanic sustainability studies, or I will not support you. It is green or death.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Free Society

At the onset of free energy, social order will change from a heierarchy system to a kind of equal autonomy. Currently, even a large family relies very heavily on many sources of labor bound by large amounts of money, equating to the stamp of an empire or nation or functioning economy.

Free energy will provide these resources without necessitating stringent social agreement. This will increase human potential. Free energy will limit these reliances.

Anyone in society could potentially leave at any time, and with very little overhead, begin a life of their own elsewhere, with others, or alone. Humans enjoy socialization and positive society and the family structure will remain for the duration of the species.

There will be nothing, or very little, enforcing humans to accept a society they dislike. Taxes will be very difficult to collect, and in fact 'pointless' considering free energy, although charity and organized charity shall not cease. Ethics, love, family, and appreciation will supercede necessity, dominance, and ownership as the primary concepts holding human society together.

Organized war of millions will probably be unheard of. WW2 or an engagement in the near future will probably be the largest military engagements humanity will ever engage in. We may find in the future that we beat our swords into plowshares and someday stop training for wars.

This will make democracy much more meaningful, and organization much more purposeful rather than ceremonial or customary. "Generation-Y" will be unheard of. People could be landowners and farmers or successful machine shop operators by 18 instead of living in their parents' homes until 27, unless they choose to remain in the family house or dwelling voluntarily by love of family.

[con't]