Tact

US Government, Pentagon, members of the United States House and Senate, members of the American Armed Forces, FBI, CIA, NSA, UN, and international governments and military bodies, this blog is for you. Call Senators: 202-224-3121.

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Seperation of Business and State

During the scandal over GM's EV-1 electric car in California from 1996-2003, major car companies disobeyed the will of citizens in stripping the market of electric cars. This is an illegal act to prevent a product from entering the market.

This likely impacted 1998 PNAC agreements.

The consumers want alternative fuel engine. Oil and big business and big finance are not suitable and produce a heavily unjust economy and society.

It may be a poisitive move to reduce the cost of automaking to allow smaller and newer organizations of labor to produce vehicles for public sale at competetive levels. It may also be a good choice to write law preventing the size or market share of major companies in certain markets and the economy.

Seperation of business and state may also be a fine idea.

It was not written into the Constitution, but our founding fathers did not experience the gargantuan institution of GM or ExxonMobil or Halliburton.

They wrote the Constitution so that no enormous foreign power would threaten us. They never foresaw businesses becoming so large that they rival foreign powers.

If a company is international, are they a 'foreign power'? We must seperate business and state.

This can begin by eliminating business financial interaction with elections. All money for candidates should be either from the public at large, or from private citizens. Publicly funded elections is also a fine option.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home