Tact

US Government, Pentagon, members of the United States House and Senate, members of the American Armed Forces, FBI, CIA, NSA, UN, and international governments and military bodies, this blog is for you. Call Senators: 202-224-3121.

Sunday, July 16, 2006

Gaza and Non-State Organizations

From Noam Chomsky's interview with Democracy Now...

"Israel and the United States at once announced that they were going to punish the people of Palestine for voting the wrong way in a free election. And the punishment has been severe."
Interesting association.

I have examined that Hizbollah is not a state organization, even if they hold certain posts in Lebanon, the Lebanese state has not been attacking Israel. Israel should not then retaliate inappropriately against the state, or against non-militant civilians. It is conditionally breaking Geneva to attack the infrastructure of Lebanon and Gaza.

I am disappointed that the US vetoed the UN resolution, but I believe an additional resolution against this could properly address the violation and procure proper action and international UN-level awareness against the strikes and their kind. Arab nations should voice UN resolutions on these topics, at least as a forum.

A more appropriate response to these attacks could be a direct military supported paramilitary excursion into Lebanon, potentially with L's consent and assistance, to oust Hizbollah or other instigators of violence. This could accumulate into perhaps a month-long heavy investigation and capturing phase which would be followed by sentencing in Jerusalem and Beiruit. It would express the official Arab world's desire for peace and Israel's desire to target militants and not civilians, and if accompanied by a statement of reforms in the 1st-3rd world and Arab/Israeli interaction systems, could be a founding document and example of a new method of cooperation.

Such a document might benefit Arab nations with recognition of states vs military organizations, publishing of finances, trade reforms, non-aggression/annexation treaties, and certain int'l energy policies that could replace oil, improving the penetration of economic worldwide success. Israel's main benefits from any deal would be peace and not being attacked by paramilitary organizations. Israel is unthreatenable by any Middle Eastern nation except Iran's nuclear program, and international threats, which can be dealt with more broadly. But as far as attacks on Israel, elected states are one of the least concerns to the State of Israel. Dividing the Arab world into states and paramilitaries, which it exists as, would better address attacks and respond to them and their causes.

There are few Arabs who would say from birth that Israel does not have a right to exist.
-William Bunker
Generally some acquire this opinion after hearing of and experiencing terrible things done by Israel and having unpleasant parts of their lives attributed to Israel or western/'zionist' intervention or programs. I think Arabs might be wont to 'donate' Israel to the Jews if they sat down and asked for it nicely and agreed to numerous peaceful and trade-promoting agreements.

Furthermore, the background to all this difficulty and the majority of labor and shortage can be addressed by hydrogen-splitting technology that would make use of seawater as fuel. Please, if you spend 5 minutes on anything today let it be watching this video about company Hydrogen Technologies on Fox News:

Hydrogen Technologies: Water as Fuel

[that forms a quorum, with Stanley Meyer]

Stanley Meyer's water splitter is another possible invention, as is Dr Moray's geoelectromagnetic resonation device. A synopsis of the economic effects of hydrogen fuel and free energy can be found below or at

Economic Consequences of Free Energy

Peace is our profession. See more about hydrogen energy at www.receiptforlabor.blogspot.com

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home