Democratic Capitalism
The results of democratic capitalism seem to be an unfair collection of wealth around a certain few at the top. This is as critically dangerous and non-water-tight as any other form of government's ills.
I believe that this kind of mercantilism cannot work. We have legally shifted beck to mercantilism from a truly free market because of the limitation of oil. Removing the economy of an enemy improves yours with more bud. I mean oil. A world of limitless economy vs a perceived and engineered world of shortage. Sterring towards peak oil is switching the world to mercantilism from capitalism. This is not legal.
Nor is it necessary. Artificial reliance on oil and artificial shortage are being imposed by megacorporations seeking to make more money on monopolies on their products.
We could have enacted anti-trust laws on vehicle companies using only oil sometime in the 1910's. Currently some company-chains have cartels. Is it legitimate to seperate a company with dotted lines across cottage components? How much stock does a company need to own in another to be considered part of that company? 50%? 25%? 5%?
We may be able to place an anti-trust suit forcing corporate change in America and the world. It will take the actions of the government and Congress, to adjust American spending policies. Oil must not be the only option. We can prove that meaningful alternative fuel and oil-efficient technologies exist by citing evidence from the patent office. We should arrange legal action to split companies from oil, for the world's good, and because of this time of fiscal difficulty.
posted by William Bunker @ 10:24 AM
1 Comments:
Democracy is a fine system and everyone's voice should be heard. But multiplied by capitalism, certain few gain considerable advantage from gaining monetary advantage and ownership of media systems, and the money required and individually centered business interest necessary for motive to monopolize business and corrupt the government. Multiply this by a state legislature and executive that relies on campaign contributions to advertise through this media, and we see massive corruptability, motive to corrupt, incentive and strong ability and prevalence of becoming able to lead in a monopolistic manner, and a pre-existing Constitutional and public social framework of deniability and control. It is a top seat with a fence around it. If business gets in there, particularly media companies, and edges out or smears popular voice with money and propaganda-like news, they can produce a state that appears to be legit by hijacking the way people talk to one another and what is said, but is autonomous and business-controlled.
It's viral.
Post a Comment
<< Home