Tact

US Government, Pentagon, members of the United States House and Senate, members of the American Armed Forces, FBI, CIA, NSA, UN, and international governments and military bodies, this blog is for you. Call Senators: 202-224-3121.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

WARGAMER

Good luck on your wargamings.

I am prepared to commit to an America that has no war on drugs, no IRS, no foreign committments in Iraq or Korea or other places.

Militarily, we're an economic body. No place in the world can meaningfully overtake a nation or man or idea and hold it by force if the people do not want it. To desire this is inconsequential.

The military's hands are tied by the massive retaliation that would come fiscally and by population from a wrongful war or series of wars, in their own country and others, but that they be sustainable. Being unsustainable, possibly by relying on oil, is a great weakness and to enhance it is to grow weaker.

Let's economically marketgame the shift and restructuring of our industry from a control-state to a free-state using free-energy and with Constitutional social policies.

Begin.

US supports Egyptian Nuclear Program over Iranian

The United States has been quietly supporting a nuclear program in Egypt, while it has been threatening to invade Iran over its nuclear program. Hans Blix and UN representatives have been unable to show that Iranians are working on an aggressive nuclear bomb, while our military policies have been advanced in aggression.

That aggressive program is the problem. Wherever this aggressive program exists, that is where the terrorist is. Currently, it is America, and its policies and force strategies in the Middle East.

Friday, October 26, 2007

Russia <3 Iran <3 Love

"(02:07:05 PM) hesnotaduck: you also may be interacting with me subconsciously
(02:07:34 PM) hesnotaduck: it can become like a television show playing softly in the background, energetically stable unto itself
(02:07:55 PM) hesnotaduck: i beleive psilocybin and other psychadelics disrupt the stability of these mental shows or dialogues
(02:08:06 PM) hesnotaduck: giving you massive amounts of new data
(02:08:10 PM) hesnotaduck: hence the trip"

===

Russia has signaled that an attack on Iran will be seen as an attack on Russia. THANK GOODNESS this will substantially slow or stop the neoconservatives' pushes for war and to battle for the world's resources. This friction should produce substantial pieces of evidence suitable for progressing the world's populace to enlightenment about the duties asked of elite socieites.

Furthermore, this primarily bans an attack on Iran, since it will disrupt the world and American voters, candidates, and international agents recognize the new risks involved. How would the American neoconservatives behave now that they do not have the potential to invade Iran so easily?

They could invade anyway and begin a tense situation, where Russia will probably have troops and hardware committed to Iran but initially limit a nuclear engagement. This shifts the global environment of an Iranian invasion and the American fascio-corporate attempt to conquer the world by monetary dominance and military actions to support that dominance based on natural resources, finance, and infrastructure, instead of unite it in peace by voluntary association of all people.

Relying on or exploting weaknesses you find in other people instead of helping to heal them is evil. Doing so weakens you and makes you evil.

I support Russia in this move, but I do not respect elements of their anti-deomcratic procedures. I also wonder what George Bush will do after having regarded the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist wing, now allied with the state of Russia. Does this make Russia a terrorist organization, Mr Bush? According to the normally approved math that you have professed, yes it does. However, I expect that you will not affirm your own math, and your retraction from the aggressive moves you have made will doubtless expose you and your motivations.

This move expedites and cements the probability of a Sino-Russian counter to an American invasion of Iran in pursuit of world resources.

Russia or China might be wise to attempt to acquire or release energy technology resources that would revolutionize the global energy industries, despite the lost potential from economic sales of their own or their neighbors' natural resources, benefits given by proxy to their perceived current enemies, adjusted future production potential ratios, or loss of control from comparative fiscal security of being energy exporters. The economic oil based growth of our world industries and markets cannot be sustained using the natural resources we currently have for much longer than a few years' time. Fighting over these resources would be a substantial loss of markets and infrastructure for any player.

Any secret society hoping to Dr. Strangelove the earth is at substantial risk of being killed regardless of their status and will emerge into an unsustainable ethical social and physical environment in the future with or without their potential comrades.

It would be far wiser to engage the libertarian revolution of not needing to care what other people think or want because you do not rely on them, which is a condition that the majority of elite people recognize will occur within 10-30 years regardless of path, with a fuller world than a lesser world, and with fewer murders rather than more.

Also consider the electromagnetic effects of the potential deaths of 3-6 billion humans. That is not beautiful. Consider the wonderful possibilities of these humans undergoing the world's greatest revolution ever, and the fine place we all would be in at that point. If you elite think you have some positive company or social market opportunities and project comanagers now, begin work on enhancing the experiences and lives of those around you who may become your new growth partners.

The world can change.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Letter to the World's Organized Elite Societies

http://someonespinchingmythirdeye.blogspot.com/2006/10/letter-to-worlds-organized-elite.html

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Iran != Iraq

This article in Esquire says that Iran will be Iraq all over again, which is bad enough coverage, but it will not be Iraq all over again for it will be worse. Far worse.

We've been suckered into Iraq. Being suckered again, deeper into the quicksand, would be attacking Iran.

Iraq was producing nothing that we needed at the time. Iraq produced only a few barrels of oil annually in a market condition that was not so tight. They were not a serious threat, and we could have waited on them for a long time. However, controlling that oil in time for peak oil 2008 and also having a good foothold for Iran and the 2004 and 2008 presidential races was of critical timing.

Iran is producing large amounts of oil. They make ~3mbd and the world uses and produces ~90mbd. Our market is so tight that oil prices are currently around $90 a barrel. Attacking Iran would leave us in a fuel situation that would produce shortage, which we haven't seen since 1973. Prices would triple and then later double. This would not be merely a shipping error, like someone holding your pants in a crimp so they are too tight, like in 1973. This would be plain growing out of your britches, partially because of a 3" reduction in their size as Iran stopped exporting oil due to military threat.

How would this be beneficial to the ones who have opened this pandora's box? Those who would invade Iran on purpose, knowing these negative fallouts and the unnecessary status of the war, knowing who really [in the governments] did 9/11, how will they benefit? They have set themselves up prior to this shortage to own a majority of the world's oil resources, and to have them guarded adequately. They also profit from the Iraq war now. They are some who seek world domination and to win the fiscal inequality we are constantly in against shortage. They would do this by gaining control of the world's resources and eliminating a majority of the world's populace.

From that point, they could manage the world's resources sustainably, probably using ancient technologies as 'sustainable' measures such as nuclear power, a labor class, and accounting for a large portion of the world to be unusable afterwards.

Little do they realize, although they may have planned well for their heinous crime, that our technologies and the hidden techs are quickly elevating to allow our current world to be sustainable, with all 7 billion people, were they properly trained. They have been working to train this world to be slaves or idiots instead for about 60 years. Had they been training for good, we would be there in about 2 years.

The reverberations of their murderous actions and plans will not rest. Their utopia, which is impossible and would collapse if it were attempted, would be beset by their emotional fallout. They would not deserve it, and it will not happen.

Doubtless, if we invaded Venezuela, China would take responsive actions. A similar situation probably exists with Iran. Russia also becomes the watchdog over the entire world, even if we do act and win once on a major scale or locally, Russia will respond and win.

Monday, October 15, 2007

End the 9/11 conspiracy.

Impeachment

Some speculate that George Bush has not been impeached because he would immediately declare war on Iran and begin martial law. His regime could do that, had they the strength. Corporations vying for control of the world's natural resources are hellbent enough to consider tailoring such activities in light of shortly forthcoming engineered population and resource limitations.

But I do not believe that such a condition would be fruitful for them. The US Congress could probably muster a veto of such a declaration of war or martial law or declare him unfit, and the Supreme Court could declare his actions unconstitutional. Furthermore, the populace would not likely accept such a situation.

The only way they could pull such a declaration off is with the Minot bomb or another false flag terror event, which is being monitored closely by numerous watchdog groups and elements of our own state. Even if they did accomplish this feat they would experience rapid response and a substantial and Constitutionally validated and legitimate '5th column' within their own military actions. They would actually be the 5th column within us, and the information required to dismantle their system would proliferate rapidly. They would not be able to sustain their evil empire for longer than 5 years at the very longest, and more probably only a matter of several months or a year before substantial heierarchy was routed.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Let it be known that global warming may be blamed for petroleum shortage related food shortages during peak oil ~2008/iran.

Vigilant Shield 2008

" Florida 9/11 Truth/WeAreCHANGEFL.ORG/Ron Paul 08

Vigilant Shield 2008

US Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) has just announced plans for an anti-terrorism exercise called Vigilant Shield 2008. The series of exercises is mandated by the US government to prepare, prevent and respond to any number of national crises that would call for the use of the military inside the United States.

Terrorism, Air Defences, and the Deployment of the U.S. Military in American Streets

Vigilant Shield 2008 builds a scenario of a domestic disaster in the US (terrorist attack or natural disaster). It posits the domestic use of the US military including a special role for the US Air Force.

Hypothetically, a terrorist event could trigger the massive deployment of the US military as part of a national emergency. If a terrorist incident were to occur and Iran were to be blamed for the attacks, the military could also be used to shunt anti-war opposition within the US.

A precedent for the domestic use of the US military within US cities was established in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina.

Vigilant Shield 2008 is said to be designed to deal with a terrorist or natural disaster scenario in the United States. Yet, the deployment of the US forces in the upcoming US military-security exercise, organised by Homeland Security and the Pentagon, resembles a war-time air scenario over North America and the Pacific rather than an anti-terrorist drill. Canadian territory is also involved through NORAD and so is Guam in the Pacific Ocean.

The Iran Link: Air War Scenario?

The involvement of a Pacific front suggests a scenario of confrontation with Russia or China. The Pacific Ocean, along with an arctic route across Canada are the most likely routes for hypothetical Chinese and Russian aerial attacks in response to a broader global war resulting from attacks on Iran. These assumptions were actually built into last year’s Vigilant Shield exercise (Vigilant Shield ’07)."

from: http://bulletins.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=bulletin.read
&messageID=4592159327&MyToken=b9122b4e-ba1c-4961-b4f9-fb0eac739cfe

This article and exercise Vigilant Shield 2008 describe the same scenario that I described below.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

A formal Hello

This article is quite timely.

I would be willing to accept a consultant position or employment working with a benevolent branch of the United States government or another government or an international positive think tank or support group.

Contact me as confidentially as you wish.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Iran and World

Some messages say the US will attack Iran in "Maximum Darkness". What they mean by "maximum darkness" is a period of evil activity. This would be a last-ditch style attempt for the neoconservative globalists to launch America into a war with Iran.

To do this, as they have failed to get their goal of 20-35% public approval, they would play all their cards consecutively. A false flag terror attack, probably a nuclear assault inside America using the Minot AFB nuclear warhead, radiological and other "terror attacks on 6-8 cities", faking evidence of Iranian complicity or nuclear capability and calling the Minot explosion Iranian, although [international] tests will quickly discover that the fallout has American signatures. The neocons would invade Iran that day, launch nuclear missiles at Tehran and other Iranian cities, and send troops from Afghanistan and Iraq to fight Iran, and see who salutes what.

They would also likely begin a severe civil rights assault in America, declaring martial law, which would be the overthrow of the US government and begin American and global civil action. Protests about the information gathered amid chaos and preemptive knowledge would spread quickly with information, as police and agencies would attempt to arrest dissidents in violtation of the first amendment. FEMA camps would be put into use for protesters who would become political prisoners while Americans would be whipped feverishly with communications about the new war.

Elements of US agencies, the US intelligence community, the military, the police, and other government and civilian branches would gain access to the massive wealth of critical information relating to the insider event and begin legal action against the authority of the president and the neoconservatives.

American resistance forces would probably form strongly within the week as information came out. A nuclear detonation inside America would be civilly unpredictable and any American civil control force would have its hands entirely full at all times.

Police civilians and soldiers in America would also be put on the ready for a Chinese or Russian land or missile attack. It is uncertain what China and Russia would do in the case of this event. Russia would not be fooled one bit about an American invasion of Iran and might declare war or become more closely involved in the region or begin invasions of eastern European states in "the new war for oil". China might threaten to attack America after dropping or even burning all their American currency/burdens, and call all of their fiscal options against us as well as coming to the defense of the Iranians and Iraqis.

America could then be fighting China and Iran in Iran and the Pacific and become involved in a British / eastern European war.

Iran would declare war on Israel and the muslims of the Middle East and Africa would likely begin attacking American and Israeli forces in Iraq and Iran and Israel, potentially with Russian or Chinese collaboration. Any nukes Iran did have they would launch at Israel, and probably wind up Patriot missiling it down [instead of lasering it up, to enhance Iranian/Arab culpability] hitting the Mediterranean ocean near Italy, where people would eat radioactive fish because of the starvation associated with the panic, world chaos, loss of supply chains, and loss of markets.

China would send 200 million soldiers across the Tigris and Euphrates from China and push Americans back to Israel. America might nuke the Chinese coast and Russian metropoli, and Russia might nuke us back. China might nuke us back. North Korea could do anything. They might attack South Korea in this shadow.

It is unlikely that Europeans would become entangled in this battle, except to defend themselves against a Russian attack, which would make them targets of the Islamists, already numerous in Europe.

America, Israel, and Europe would probably *lose* this war based on land forces and capabilities, numbers, objectives to *hold*, and nuclear arsenals. We have weakened our forces to the point of exhaustion and near panic and our political system and storyline is basically indefensible. A successful trick with the Minot nuke could embolden our forces and populace to hold together for a time, but the information has already been produced, and we have no nukes that display unique particulate signatures. All signatures would be traceable to America, leaving only a day or so of flash to get involved in the war.

Our companies have been working on America and the world for so long. Would they be able to survive fiscally in a Sino-Russian Islamic world? Probably would either become unlikely barons or not at all.

The American empire that they knew is going under. It is being replaced by an increasingly aware American populace interested in freedom and love and peace and not paying taxes while smoking marijuana and experiencing free energy machines. The 2008 election will fall to Ron Paul and those associated with him will tear down their financial devices and replace them with meaningful sustainable economic and social policies for a safe world government by the mid 2010's. Major companies will be reigned in and eviscerated by libertarian science machines and social revolutions. We will win.

A China/Russia/Islam, were it to prosper, would likely crumble into itself shortly after. Imagine what would happen if Hitler had won.

This is the worst case scenario.

If we cut off China's oil supplies, they might simply stall us out by holding all our currency down or retooling their factories with our money for our natural resources, on the cheap.

We should leave Iraq now.

Monday, October 08, 2007

The Israeli Lobby, Center of the Illuminati

i agree 110%! screw that money, talk out loud!

israel does commit inexcusable international espionage and participates in running the US for its own interests. it has since the Levon Affair, and never quit.

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: My Hate Speech2
Date: Oct 8, 2007 1:01 AM


Dissenting at your own risk


By CECILIE SURASKY
Special to the Star-Telegram

Last year, I agreed to speak to a Jewish youth group about my organization, Jewish Voice for Peace, and our opposition to Israel's occupation. My talk was to follow one from a member of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which calls itself "America's pro-Israel Lobby."

A week before, a shaken program leader said the AIPAC staffer had threatened to get the entire youth program's funding canceled if I was allowed in the door. The threat worked, and in disgust, they canceled the whole talk.

Pundits will surely argue for years about professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer's explosive new book, The Israel Lobby, which blames poor U.S. policy in the Middle East on a loose network of individuals and pro-Israel advocacy groups.

But the book, and the response to it, opens up another controversy: the stifling of debate about unconditional U.S. support for Israeli policies.

Why is Israel's increasingly brutal 40-year occupation of Palestinian land regularly debated in the mainstream media abroad, including in Israel, but not here? And why is there an almost total lack of discussion among presidential candidates about the dollars that subsidize this occupation and the American diplomatic support that makes it possible?

In a society built on the free exchange of ideas, as Walt and Mearsheimer point out, one answer can be found by looking at the many self-appointed gatekeepers, such as Abraham Foxman and the Anti-Defamation League, or Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, who use their Jewish identity as both a shield and cudgel. They work diligently to silence those who question ill-conceived policies of the Israeli and U.S. governments.

Non-Jewish critics, even former President Carter, are denounced as anti-Semites. Special ire is reserved for Jewish dissenters, who are branded as "self-hating" or "marginal," while Muslim and Arab-Americans are easily smeared and even criminalized with charges of supporting terrorism.

Stunned by the stifling of dissent, we decided to start a Web site, Muzzlewatch, to track the incidents. Just as we launched, Stanford Middle East Studies Professor Joel Beinin was disinvited from a speaking engagement at a high school with just 24 hours' notice.

After an unprecedented campaign of outside interference waged by Dershowitz, Professor Norman Finkelstein was refused tenure by DePaul University because of his criticism of U.S.-Israeli policy. Palestinian-American anthropologist Nadia Abu El-Haj is fighting a political campaign to deny her tenure at Barnard.

Even Walt and Mearsheimer, who are getting plenty of exposure, couldn't have asked for better proof of their point that the lobby works to stifle dissent when an embarrassed head of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs told them that their scheduled speech was canceled. (They did speak before the World Affairs Council of Dallas/Fort Worth on Sept. 17.) This was apparently because Foxman was not available that day to "balance" their talk.

(They had initially been booked by themselves. The talk was not rescheduled.)

Many groups that started with the important work of fighting real anti-Semitism now rely on anti-Semitism to insist that to show one's love of Jews, one must offer uncritical support to Israel. They are especially displeased by Jews who believe that enabling Israeli violations of Palestinian human rights is not good for anyone.

Unless this atmosphere of intimidation is confronted, Americans will continue to lack access to information and perspectives necessary to formulate effective Middle East policies, virtually ensuring that Israel and the United States will be at war for many years to come.

'The Israel Lobby'

A podcast of Walt and Mearsheimer's presentation is available at http://podcast.dfwworld.org/

A Bankers' Fascism

http:// www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=5572

http://bulletins.myspace.com...

Remarkable. We live in a bankers' fascism, where rights are convenient because they make commerce more comfortable for the majority. the majority must be awoken. they are some kind of emotional grouping of individuals who have been shaped and coerced by these controllers to be an anchor of some sort for doing what they want, within reason. let this anchor awaken and move to its own will, and it will hurl them into space.

In truth, the Constitution and love and freedom are the real rulers of earth, and the heart.

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Odigo

Odigo Israeli instant messaging service provided warnings about the 9/11 attacks that were accurate to the minute. Analysis to follow.

Cia Cocaine Chain

US CIA Rendition plane crashes in Yucatan penninsula, carrying 3.3 metric tons of cocaine. They were being pursued by Mexican attack helicopters for illegally entering Mexican airspace.

The CIA is responsible for the drug war and profiting from it extensively. They have been accused of poisoning/testing the general public at times with LSD in the 1950's and 1960's, introducing drugs to the hippie movement to disorganize civil disobedience, and making large profit from covert state sale of cocaine since the 1970's and crack since the 80's. We've also gotten heavily involved in Colombia's drug war [do not drink Colombian coffee as we herbicide that nation]. Keeping drugs illegal keeps drug prices in America and to a degree in Europe high, which keeps CIA profits high for undeclared missions. It has also increased funding nationally for local police forces and been an agent of class division and organized crime, which the CIA benefits from in other ways. Some drugs have medicinal qualities and compete with pharmaceutical companies marketing, and non-drug hemp has industrial and fuel uses that compete in other markets. These drugs are also available worldwide and pose risk to tens of billions of dollars in profit for American companies, so they have been illegalized.

This article says that increased enforcement in Mexico has disrupted cocaine traffic to USA. This is true. They stopped American shipments of cocaine from South America to America.

The US has likely also stopped the other secret shipments through Mexico for a time, or are in negotiations with Mexico to cut them in on the deal or pay them off. This should not happen. Mexico legalized all drugs for about 3 days last year, but was quickly harassed into banning them again. Jamaica tried to legalize drugs as well, but their legislation was harassed off the table by Americans.

This halt in Mexico will probably have some impact on American secret operations funding and exposes the CIA and other American chains to international scrutiny and awareness.

Venezuela might choose to expose American drug work in their neighboring regions to their oil partners. Bolivia might do the same.

Numerous nations in Europe have successfully ended the drug war. Their society-wide levels of use and private funding from drugs are far lower than Americans'. Their society and court system is uncluttered by drug offenders and functions more properly. Europeans enjoy greater freedom and healthcare benefits.

American information is available to open the drug war. [420pm]

Monday, October 01, 2007

Noam Chomsky: A Revolution is Just under the Surface

An American revolution is happening right now.


Chomsky-
"I don't think these ideas are very far below consciousness almost anywhere, including the United States. If you talk to working class people they understand the notions. If fact it's not too well known but in the United States, there was never a powerful organized left, but in many ways it's one of the most leftist societies in the world."

This is the coolest time period since 1967.

This is especially crucial in America, since America runs the world. A revolution in America will prompt co-revolutions in every other nation in the world. The revolutiunion will be a global event, spurred by global events, and do much to unite freedomloving mankind under good, liberty, and freedom, and the rest under evil and control.

This revolution could be through Dr Ron Paul by election. It could be from Americans speaking out en masse in peace when the education level reaches critical mass.